Quantcast
Channel: Crossdreamers
Viewing all 257 articles
Browse latest View live

Prince as a Crossdreamer, and What it Means for the Transgender Debate

$
0
0
We have lost Prince, AKA Prince Rogers Nelson, one of the biggest pop artists and composers in modern history, and I find myself marvelling at the fact that the world is mourning one of the most well known crossdreamers of all time. People do not seem to mind that he was one!
Prince in a female pose on the cover of Lovesexy


Mr. Sexually Explicit

Prince had very limited inhibitions when it came to presenting his sexual fantasies in lyrics. This was, after all, the man who told us about his Darling Nikki that "she was a sex fiend. I met her in a hotel lobby, masturbating with a magazine".

Nikki was partly the cause for Tipper Gore founding  the Parents Music Resource Center in the US. This led  to the use of "Parental Advisory" stickers on album covers in that country, assumedly protecting children from harmful content.

So yes, you can safely say that Prince caused controversy as a person who made "dirty lyrics" and as such was classified as a "pervert" by those more emotionally restricted.

But he was never slammed, as I can see, for being a crossdreamer or someone making gender-crossing sexy. When going through all the obituaries and articles, I can't find one single negative reference to this topic. Searching the Net I can't find one single page where Prince and the stigmatizing and invalidating concept of "autogynephilia" are mentioned in the same paragraph.

"I'm not a woman, I'm not a man"


People do use terms like "queer," "ambisexual," "androgynous" and "polysexual" when writing about Prince.

 This makes sense given lyrics like the ones found in "I Would Die 4 U", a love song with strong religious or mystical overtones. (Video here. Full lyrics here).

Prince sings:
I'm not a woman
I'm not a man
I am something that you'll never understand
Then there is the famous Prince symbol or logo, which unites the male and the female  in one glyph.


But most commenters discusses this kind of gender-crossing with respect, or at least some positive fascination.

People never use terms like "transvestite", "transvestic fetishist" or "autogynephiliac", in spite of Prince dressing up in clothes that are undeniable feminine.


Mind you, I am glad this is the case, but I am curious as to what causes this immunity to the curse of so many gender variant and transgender people: The accusation of being some kind of sexual freak.

The Love Symbol of Prince, uniting Venus and Mars.
You  would think the supporters of theories that invalidate transgender people (and I use the term transgender in its wide umbrella sense of "gender variant" here) would feel compelled to use this blatant example of crossgender eroticism as their prime example of a "paraphilia", but no.

Prince as crossdreamer

Which is strange, because it is not as if he has been hiding his fantasies of being a woman, nor their sensual and erotic overtones.

In "Tamborine" he asks his female partner about what it feels like to be her:
Oh my God here U are
Prettiest thing in life I've ever seen
Close my eyes what's it like,
What's it like inside your tamborine?
In "If I Was Your Girlfriend" (full lyrics over at CDL) Prince presents the common MTF crossdreamer fantasy of being allowed to be a woman among women, opening the song with a shop assistant calling out to the female customers: "Look at the bargains over here, ladies..." followed by a snippet of bridal music.

He is looking for the kind of female intimacy that his role as a man denies him:
If I was your girlfriend
Would U remember 2 tell me all the things U forgot
When I was your man?
Hey, when I was your man
If I was your best friend
Would U let me take care of U and do all the things
That only a best friend can
He wants to help her pick out her clothes, wash her hair, make her breakfast. "Could we go to the movies and cry together?" he asks, and paints a picture of them being lesbian lovers, and he taking on the role of a woman:
Of course I'll undress in front of U!
And when I'm naked, what shall I do?
How can I make U see that it's cool?
Can't U just trust me?
If I was your girlfriend U could
Oh, yeah, I think so
Listen, 4 U naked I would dance a ballet
Would that get U off?



This is not the only song where he touches upon some kind of gender fluidity:

"If I gave you diamonds and pearls, would you be a happy boy or a girl?" he asks in "Diamond and Pearls".

"I want to be your brother, I want to be your mother and your sister, too," he sings in "I Wanna Be Your Lover."

Playing with gender roles

He also playfully switches gender roles in movies and videos.

This is very clear in the video for the superhit "Kiss", where Prince dances around Lisa (one of the lesbian members of his band The Revolution) in a seductive feminine manner, singing in a high falsetto voice.

She sits still and composed, doing "the man's job", if we are to live up to the stereotypes. The gender bending is accentuated by Prince letting the female dancer "sing" the more manly part of the verse.



Prince as lesbian

Lisa Coleman and her friend Wendy Melvoin are the ones who have most clearly commented upon Prince's female side.  In an interview with Out they give us the following amazing series of quotes:
Lisa: He was little and kinda prissy and everything. But he's so not gay. 
Wendy: He's a girl, for sure, but he's not gay. He looked at me like a gay woman would look at another woman. 
Lisa: Totally. He's like a fancy lesbian. 
Wendy: I remember being at that Sexuality video shoot and him on stage with that little black jacket and that tie thing around his neck and his black pants with white buttons on the side. 
And we looked at each other for the first time and I thought, Oh, I could so fall in love with that girl easy. It doesn't matter what sexuality, gender you are. You're in the room with him and he gives you that look and you're like, Okay, Im done. Its over. He's Casanova. He's Valentino.
Was Prince transgender in any sense of the term? His interview on Ophra seems to indicate that he was, but I haven't found any other references to him saying so.


Was Prince Gay?

Many male to female crossdreamers of the gynephilic, woman-loving, persuasion will often questions their sexual orientation, over and over again, as the fantasies of switching the typical gender roles in bed -- as in being the bottom instead of the top -- is immediately associated with being "gay". Internalized homophobia may make this a problem for some, at least for a time.

I do not sense much homophobia in Prince, at least not before he became a member of Jehova's Witnesses (even if he in one song fantasizes about turning a lesbian woman around).

But he does question his own sexuality, while at the same time celebrating the diversity of gender and sexuality.

"Am I black or white, am I straight or gay?" he asks in "Controversy".

Here's from "Uptown:"
"She saw me walking down the streets of your fine city It kinda turned me on when she looked at me and said, "come here". Now I don't usually talk to strangers but she looked so pretty  What can I lose, if I, uh, just give her a little ear? "What's up little girl?" "I ain't got time to play." Baby didn't say too much. She said, "Are you gay?" Kinda took me by surprise, I didn't know what to do I just looked her in her eyes and I said, "no, are you?" Said to myself, said "She's just a crazy, crazy, crazy little mixed up dame. She's just a victim of society and all its games." Now where I come from we don't let society tell us how it's supposed to be. Our clothes, our hair, we don't care. It's all about being there. Everybody's going uptown. That's where I want to be."
There is no doubt that Prince loved women, so if his sexual orientation was ambiguous, it was as a bisexual or polysexual.

Beyond the Fetish

Which brings me back to the original question: Why hasn't Prince been used as an example by those who wants to reduce crossdreaming and gender variance among male to female crossdressers and transgender people?

I suspect that it has something to do with what Wendy alluded to in the quote above. Prince was an extremely attractive man, to the point of making a lesbian woman admit as much. Straight women flocked around him, at the same time as he managed to become a bit of a gay icon.

The stereotype of the woman-loving male to female crossdresser and crossdreamer, however, stipulates that he has to be some kind of unfeminine and unattractive "man in a frock", the kind of image transphobic bathroom billers in the US try to paint in order to keep trans women out of public restrooms.

This is the stereotype presented by those promoting the "autogynephilia" theory as well.  The only male to female transgender people who can be even remotely feminine or sexually attractive are the androphilic, man loving, trans women or -- as Ray Blanchard and J. Michael Bailey so insultingly call them: extremely effeminate gay men.

The male to female "non-homosexual" transgender "man" is an evolutionary dead end, according to this theory, a man lost -- in love with his inner woman -- without much interest in women "out there" -- again according to Blanchard.

People like Prince, as well as other straight or bisexual male rock and pop stars who have flirted with gender variance or who express some kind of femininity, are ignored by transphobic scientists and activists because they prove that "androgyny" or being genderqueer or some shade of transgender does not necessarily make you uninteresting in the eyes of straight women. It may, in fact, make you more attractive.

I suspect that is why they do not mention people like Prince, David Bowie or Freddie Mercury, because their example messes up the whole mental map of the scientists lost in the pathologizing version of the binary.

There are many reasons why the work of Prince is important in a gender and sexuality setting, and this is one of them: He was a living proof of the stereotypes being exactly that: Stereotypes.

Thanks to Uli and Lost. Main photos from the New York Times.

See also:  Christina Cauterucci on "How Prince Led the Way to Our Gender Fluid Present"
Marcus Patrick Ellsworth: "Words of Liberation, Prince's Lyrics and Queer Identity".
Pence Kornhaber: Prince: "Gay Icon, Whether He Wanted to Be or Not"
Zeba Blay: Prince’s Revolutionary, Complicated Relationship With Black Masculinity

Great movies, documentaries and web series from the Transgender Film Festival in Kiel

$
0
0
Poster for The Danish Girl in Kiel.
(Photo from festival Facebook page)

Andy has sent me an overview of the awards of this year's Transgender Film Festival in Kiel.

There are a lot of interesting films here, and I have included some relevant clips for you below.

This festival is the only one of its kind in Germany, and as you will see, it takes a much needed broad approach to the term transgender.

The selection of movies, documentaries, TV/web shows and songs reflects the current surge in interest for transgender people as well as the artistic abilities of trans people themselves.


Best Film of the Year:

Her Story directed by Sydney Freeland, a web series on the dating lives of trans and queer women.



Best Trans-Performance:

Angelica Ross in Her Story
Khaleb Brooks in the web series Boxx

Khaleb Brooks


Best Actress:

Alicia Vikander in The Danish Girl. (She also won an Oscar for this role).

Alicia Vikander, scene from the movie.


Best Actor:

Christian Ochoa in Her Story

Actors Angelica Ross & Christian Ochoa on the set of Her Story. Photo Credit: Tamea A. photobytamea.com

Best Documentary:

The Pearl of Africa by Jonny von Wallström, a film about Cleopatra Kambugu, a 27 year old Ugandan trans woman.



Best Song:

"Toyland" by Mya Taylor in Tangerine, a movie about two African-American transgender women in Los Angeles.



Best Poster:

The Danish Girl

The Danish Girl, main poster.
This Hollywood movie presents a fictitious love story inspired by the lives of Danish artists Lili Elbe and Gerda Wegener.  Eddie Redmayne, who is not a transgender person, plays the role of Lili.

Best Website:

dragmovie.com (on a movie telling the story of East London’s drag scene)
pearlofafrica.tv (presenting the Ugandian movie Pearl of Africa)
thestonewallmovie.com (The Stonewall movie was not well received in the transgender community, but I guess that does not mean that the web site is bad)

Best Short Film:

Vessels by Arkasha Stevenson, a movie that follows Diamond, a young Latina transgender woman living in Los Angeles.

Vessels - 60sec Trailer from Steph Zenee Perez on Vimeo.

Best Trans Performance (MtF) in a Short Film:

Diamond Cruz in Vessels.

Best Trans Performance (FtM) in a short Film:

Will Krisanda in Brothers Season 2/Episode 1. Brothers is a series on trans masculine love.


Best Actress in a Short Film:

Julienne Jones in Brothers season 2/episode 1

Julienne Jones (photo from her web site)
Best Short Documentary:

Elise by Evan Sterrett and Jo Bradlee, a twelve-minute documentary that follows a young, transgender and homeless woman in Washington D.C.


Best Concert Performance:

Eines Tages by Cassy Carrington, a German transgender woman and artist.



Best Music Video:

"Leben Spüren" by Cassy Carrington.

Cassy Carrington & ihr Herr Cosler - LEBEN SPÜREN from Silke Engler on Vimeo.

Looking for students and scientists who want to study transgender issues

$
0
0
Dr. Jaimie Veale is looking for students and researchers who would be interested in studying transgender  issues.
Jaimie Veale


Dr. Jaimie Veale has done some extremely important research in transgender people, documenting, for instance, a diversity and a complexity that goes far beyond the traditional dichotomies between two types of male to female transgender people.

In this context she has delivered compelling evidence that undermines the so-called "autogynephilia" theory of Dr. Ray Blanchard of Toronto, a theory that effectively reduces transgender identities to paraphilias.

I have presented some of her research here  and here, and you can find more material over at her own web site.

Having spent some time in British Columbia, Jaimie is now back in New Zealand, in a faculty position at the School of Psychology at the University of Waikato.

In time Jaimie hopes to be able to build up a team of researchers interested in everything transgender (crossdreaming included). If you are interested in this kind of research, and would even like to contribute yourself, do not hesitate to contact her. She may even supervise students from a distance.

The Medieval Crossdreamer

$
0
0
Jewish women in Haggadah for Passover (the ‘Golden Haggadah”)
The story about a medieval  poem on  becoming your true gender.

Many of you will have met the following argument in the transgender debate:

Since crossdreaming and transgender identities are social constructs, they are most likely to be the end product of modern Capitalist society, the Patriarchy or something equally sinister -- an line of argument which will most likely lead to a discussion about sexualization and fetishes.

This impression is reinforced by the fact that historians and art scholars have had a tendency to ignore -- or outright censor -- the voices of gender variant people from other cultures and epochs.

As I pointed out in my blog post on  crossdreamers in the Kama Sutra, until recently all English translations of that work skipped the part about straight women dominating straight men, most likely because it was considered threatening to the world order or impossible to understand.

So a lot of work is needed in this field. I am confident that if we look, we will find crossdreamers and transgender people in all cultures and all periods of time. They lives will be expressed in different manners according to  local language and cultural framework (as they are today), but they will have this in common: A desire or a need to express or be recognised as their true gender or as a blend of the two.

A Medieval Poem About the Longing to Become a Woman

A year ago Tuitey made me aware of a beautiful transgender poem over at tumblr.

The poem was written in the 14th century by a Jewish male to female transgender philosopher  and translator from Provence:  Kalonymos ben Kalonymus (also known as Qalonymos ben Qalonymos ben Meir). The poem was originally published in the book Even Bohan (or Eben Bohan) in 1322.


The transgender content of the poem has been dismissed as some kind of mischievous humor (and there is definitely humor in the text).

Others have pointed to parts that describe the burden of being a man under Jewish law ("Strong statutes and awesome commandments, six hundred and thirteen"), arguing -- I presume -- that this is more about showing how hard life can be for a man.

But to me it clearly expresses s a deep longing for the life of a woman.

The Beauty of Women

Take, for instance, this description of women:
. . . Oh, but had the artisan who made me
created me instead—a fair woman.
Today I would be wise and insightful.
We would weave, my friends and I,
and in the moonlight spin our yarn,
and tell our stories to one another,
from dusk till midnight.
We’d tell of the events of our day, silly things,
matters of no consequence.
But also I would grow very wise from the spinning,
and I would say, “Happy is she who knows how to work with combed flax and weave it into fine white linen.”
This is not irony. This is true appreciation of the culture and abilities of women. The author truly longs to be one of them.

Jewish women from Aragon dancing, ca. 1350–1360. 
Dressing as a woman

There is also a clear crossdressing aspect to the author's fantasy:
On holidays I would put on my best jewelry.
I would beat on the drum
and my clapping hands would ring.
And when I was ready and the time was right,
an excellent youth would be my fortune.
He would love me, place me on a pedestal,
dress me in jewels of gold,
earrings, bracelets, necklaces.
According to G.G. Bolich this is not the only place where Kalonymos writes about dressing up like a woman. ("Oh my heart, you seduced me [to desire...] precious attire... and fine... linen of the kind virgin princesses wear.")

Being a sexual woman

Is there any erotic crossdreaming? Does Kalonymos dream of being a sensual woman? Most certainly!
He [her husband] would not chastise nor harshly treat me,
and my [sexual] pleasure he would not diminish
Every Sabbath, and each new moon,
his head he would rest upon my breast.
The three husbandly duties he would fulfill,
rations, raiment, and regular intimacy.
And three wifely duties would I also fulfill,
[watching for menstrual] blood, [Sabbath candle] lights, and bread. . .
Magical transformation

In contemporary crossdreamer fantasies there is often a miracle of sorts, magical or scientific, that makes the new life possible. This is also found in this poem:
Father in heaven, who did miracles for our ancestors with fire and water,
You changed the fire of Chaldees so it would not burn hot,
You changed Dina in the womb of her mother to a girl,
You changed the staff to a snake before a million eyes,
You changed [Moses’] hand to [leprous] white
and the sea to dry land.
In the desert you turned rock to water,
hard flint to a fountain.
Who would then turn me from a man to woman?
Were I only to have merited this, being so graced by your goodness. . .
The tragedy

And underneath it all is the tragedy of the gender dysphoric person who realizes that her dream will never become reality:
What shall I say? Why cry or be bitter?
If my Father in heaven has decreed upon me
and has maimed me with an immutable deformity,
then I do not wish to remove it.
And the sorrow of the impossible
is a human pain that nothing will cure
and for which no comfort can be found.
So, I will bear and suffer
until I die and wither in the ground.
The poem does end in irony, as the author quotes the traditional Jewish blessing:
Blessed are you, O Lord,
who has not made me a woman.
The original text i Hebrew (with English language translation)
Alternative translation by Peter Cole (PDF)
G. G. Bolich: Gender Studies

Reflections on a Possible Crossdreamer Pride Flag

$
0
0
Transgender flag presented in Pride parade (Getty).
We are in the middle of the global Pride season. There seems to be a flag for any sexual and romantic orientation possible, and others for  gender identity.  But is there one for crossdreamers and crossdressers? And do we need one?

As regards the second question:

Probably not, as most -- if not all -- crossdressers and crossdreamers fit under the transgender umbrella. They are all -- in one way or the other -- gender variant.

The transgender flag

And we already do have a transgender flag, created by American trans woman Monica Helms in 1999.

The transgender flag
Helms described the meaning of the transgender pride flag as follows: 
"The stripes at the top and bottom are light blue, the traditional color for baby boys. The stripes next to them are pink, the traditional color for baby girls. The stripe in the middle is white, for those who are intersex, transitioning or consider themselves having a neutral or undefined gender. The pattern is such that no matter which way you fly it, it is always correct, signifying us finding correctness in our lives."
Some still find it a bit traditional, restrictive and binary (especially because of the baby color reference), but as far as I can see, there is ample room for non-binary transgender identities under this flag. The description may -- for instance -- include crossdreamers and crossdressers who present as their assigned gender, but who still feel the need to express the other side of their personality. 

Besides,  many crossdreamers find that they are  transsexual, and end up presenting and living as their target gender.

A crossdreamer flag proposal

But there is more to flags than actually having to fly them in public, as a recent discussion over at Crossdream Life  clearly demonstrates.

Lost247365  presented this sketch of a possible crossdreamer flag some days ago. It was Lost's presentation and the following discussion that caught my interest, more than the question of whether this flag will actually ever fly in a Pride parade.


Lost's crossdreamer flag proposal
Lost explained it this way:
"I know I would try and make [a flag] that incorporated Caeneus spear for FTM crossdreams and two snakes to represent Tiresias and MTF crossdreams.  Maybe some wings and red poppies to represent Morpheus the god of dreams (and a TG author I really like) and desire."
Lost had already presented some of these mythical symbols in figures in another interesting thread on the forum.

The symbols are all meaningful from a crossdreamer and transgender perspective:

1. The spear of Caeneus.

Lost presents the myth about Caeneus in this way in the  mythology thread over at Crossdream Life:
"In this myth, Poseidon takes an interest in a young nymph named Caenis (the daughter of the demi-god Atrax).  So one day while she was at the beach he rapes her.  Afterwards, she is so distraught by what happens that Poseidon regrets his actions and decides to make it up to her by granting her any wish that she desires.   
Caenis wishes to be a man and that no one would ever penetrate her again.  Poseidon then goes to Hephaestus and has him create a magic spear for her.  He  gives the spear to her and it turns her into a man and makes his skin impenetrable to any weapon.  Caenis then masculines his name to Caeneus and goes and joins the Lapith army."
Caeneus fighting centaur.
This is clearly a story deeply embedded in ancient archetypes, the phallic spear representing penetration and traditional male power.

I should add that not all female to male crossdreamers are  looking for this kind of power, but for some their fantasies may actually include "being on top", both in the sexual and the traditional social way.

By the way: In mystical Christianity the spear may also indirectly refer to the female.

In the Gospel of John Jesus is pierced with a spear while on the cross, and blood and water come out. This has been interpreted as a symbol of birth, giving Jesus the role of the mother of rebirth. This was a common idea all the way up to the Baroque period.

2. The staff of Tiresias:
Tiresias being turned into a woman.
Engraving by Johann Ulrich Kraus c. 1690.


Students of English literature will probably know Tiresias from T. S. Eliot's "Wasteland". Tiresias, the man, came upon two snakes copulating, and decided to part them with his staff.

This angered the goddess Hera so much that she decided to turn him into a woman.

I guess her anger stems from his attempt to stop nature from running its natural course. Hera was a goddess of nature, after all.

Tiresias became a priestess of Hera, married and had children.

In some of her incarnations Tiresias takes on the role of the temple priestess and prostitute, similar to the ones of mother goddesses like Inanna and Cybele. (The priestesses of Cybele were originally castrated transgender women, if we allow ourselves to use the terminology of today).

You can also see the parallel to shamanistic cultures, where the shaman may change gender or merge them both.

Tiresias was also blinded. Blindness often refers to the gift of inner sight, and the ability to see beyond traditional categories. Transgender people often find themselves forced into these types of insights when they struggle with their own identities.

The caduceus of Hermes.
Tiresias found the snakes again in some versions of the story; she left them alone and was returned to the shape of a man.

(By the way, there is one amusing part of the Tiresias story that may serve as a correction to the 19th century myth of the timid, low libido, woman.

Tiresias was asked by Hera and Zeus on who experienced the best sex, men or women. Tiresias, who had been both, told the two that women got ten times as much pleasure out of  sex as men do. MTF crossdreamers will not be surprised when they hear this.)
Hellenistic statue of Hermaphroditus.

In the discussion over at Crossdream Life I added that the two snakes with wings may also refer to Hermes, the messenger of the gods, and his staff, the caduceus. As I see it crossdreamers and crossdressers often do carry the message that the world is much more complex than many people would like it to be.

Besides, together with Aphrodite Hermes got the child Hermaprhoditus (i.e. Hermes+Aphroditus), who came to be merged with the water nymph Salmacis, joining the male with the female.

The two snakes clearly refer to the polarity of male and female, while the way thye are interwined points to the fact that the two opposites are depending on each other, and overlapping.

3. The poppies of Morpheus:

The Greek god of dreams slept in a cave full of poppy seeds. Morpheus was the dream messenger of gods, communicating their messages through images and stories, created as dreams. He was another kind of Hermes, if you like.

I also enjoy the link to Morpheus, who -- as many of us know -- was incarnated in Laurence Fishburne in the Matrix movie, a movie made by two transgender women (and most likely crossdreamers): Lana and Lily Wachowski.

In The Matrix Morpheus is the one presenting Neo with the famous red and blue pills. The red pill (in the binary referring to the female) is the one that leads to enlightenment. A coincidence? I do not think so.



The blue rose

Another relevant symbol that popped up in the Crossdream Life discussion was the blue rose, first presented by JustEva.

Blue rose flag with a St. Andrew's cross representing 
crossdressing and crossdreaming. 
My design, with rose by Iryna Neklyudova.
She argues that the blue rose  is a symbol of  dreams of transcendent, inaccessible beauty. It points to the the dream of becoming something, something that you cannot become by traditional means.

However: You may paint a white rose blue, making a symbol of crossdressing and other crossdreamer activities.

Or you may use new scientific methods: "In case of blue rose - genetic modification, in case of us, hormonal and surgical transition."

Explaining Gender Dysphoria

$
0
0
Photo by Patrick Miko 

Lisa Mullin, a transgender woman, explores the nature of gender dysphoria or that deep sense of discomfort and suffering that may come from living in a body and a social role that does not match your inner sense of self.

By Special Guest Writer Lisa Mullin


It is incredibly hard to explain to others what gender dysphoria actually feels like. The concepts can be so alien to an ordinary cis (non-transgender) person that it would be easier to explain quantum theory….

It is hard enough for trans adults to understand and explain but even more difficult for parents trying to understand their child and work out whether they are transgender or not.

But here is my attempt.

Is see this as having three dimensions that vary for every trans person:

(1) Physical

(2) Behavioural

(3) Visual

Each can be broken down further.

Physical Aspects

This is the simplest and the easiest for others to understand. Basically you miss bits you should have and don’t like bits you do have. They just feel ‘wrong’ to you.

It never goes away, though you can distract yourself from it, even suppress the feelings for periods of time. It can become very intense at puberty when, especially for trans boys, things like breasts start growing.

Here's a personal example: I didn’t want my penis as a kid, even tried to cut it off (stopped real fast when it hurt though, I barely broke the skin).

I missed having a vagina (even though I didn’t know what that was) and kept feeling between my legs as a young (6-10) kid to see if it was there and if it had grown in yet (as I expected).

The sadness I felt when I was older and knew it would not happen was intense.

Behavioural Aspects

This is complicated because it covers a range of things. Body movements, hand movements, voice, games played, types of friends, toy preferences and so many others.

We tend to over simplify all this by calling non stereotypical behaviour as gender non conforming (GNC, the DSM psychiatric manual used to pathologise this as GID or "gender identity disorder"). It also gets stereotyped for trans kids as boys wanting to play with Barbies or girls with trucks.

But that is too simple. A trans girl might not be into dolls and be into spaceships (like me as a kid) but act in an effeminate way in terms of body language and much prefer to play with girls. They might like sports but not the standard male contact ones (say swimming vs football). They might like to dress up, but not sing and dance because they are shy…. A trans boy might love dolls and also playing football. And so on.
There is as much diversity as regards interests
and abilities among trans kids as there are
among cis kids. Their gender identity cannot be
reduced to stereotypic behaviour.

This can be confusing for parents with trans kids (heck it is confusing for trans adults) trying to work them out. This is because other factors come into play as well. Such as how extroverted they are, how sensitive they are to signals from parents (etc) that ‘this is bad’.

A quiet shy, introverted and sensitive kid can quickly learn to hide such behaviour, as they pick up that their parents (etc) are uncomfortable with it, they are not naturally demonstrative in public in any case and prefer to ‘fit in’ quietly and not be a centre of attention.

The 'possible' link between childhood expressed gender dysphoria and ASD (autism spectrum disorder) might be explained by this; those with a degree of it are more immune to negative social signals and are more prepared to push their personal desires in the face of it.

This is almost certainly a factor for those kids who ‘come out’ as transgender at early puberty, with no ‘apparent’ symptoms beforehand. They have been hiding it due to fear of rejection and only the greater fear of the impacts of puberty finally motivates them.

Never underestimate how well kids can hide things from their parents and the smarter and more sensitive they are, the better they are at it.

There is this damaging Trans Myth that EVERY trans kid is extremely and stereotypically feminine or masculine acting and presenting as such in EVERY way as a young kid.

Personal Example #1: (which I had forgotten until told to me by my relatives recently): I was very careful not to be caught at home putting on my mums or aunts clothes as a kid, but when I stayed with my cousins I did dress ups and played with the girls.

Personal Example #2: I once did some imaginary play in front of my parents, pretending to be Robin climbing up a wall (like in the Batman TV series). My father made a derogatory comment and I never once did it in front of him again. That's all it took ..a single negative comment.

Visual Aspects
In some way the most complex because it covers actual self image, preferred self image, how distressed you feel at mismatches in self image.

How you see yourself (say) fully dressed. Or just your face, or your genitals or your breasts.

Human beings are visual creatures and how you look, how you imagine you look to others and how others actually see you can have an extremely powerful impact on how you feel.
By unknown artist. (Found on tumblr)

Typically those with gender dysphoria have very critical feelings about their original looks, especially things like their face which you see in the mirror so often. It just looks wrong to you when you see yourself, there is this ‘wrong face’ all the time.

Clothing and other things like hair cuts, wigs and makeup can help a lot in matching preferred self image to what is actual.

A classic example is Facial Surgery (FFS) which is commonly desired by those adults that badly suffer from face related 'visual dysphoria' if they have been damaged by puberty and testosterone, it reduces their dysphoria caused by seeing the ‘real’ face versus their ‘internal’ one. Which, because this is the most common thing seen, can cause serious distress.

Yet another argument for transitioning as young as possible as those who do avoid this very difficult issue that can be so traumatic for so many trans adults.

Similar things apply to many other visually related areas (you could write a book on this).

Everyone is a Combination


Every trans person has different levels of these aspects though they all will have some level of all three of them. Some may be far more Visual than Physical, others more Physical than Behavioural.

In my case I would score myself as in terms of my dysphoria as a kid as (out of 10):

Physical: 9.

Behavioural: 8, varying with who I was with, 8 with parents (hiding it), 5 with my cousins as I could relax more with them and act more naturally.
Visual: 5, I was less worried about how I looked than I was about how I felt and wanted to act.

One Dimension Can Affect Another


The complexities increase as one dimension will affect another creating complex feedback loops.

An example of such a loop is how you really look impacts your physical feelings, the feeling of having the wrong ‘bit’ can be made much worse by seeing it.

Equally, being all dressed up and seeing yourself can make you feel more like the correct gender.

Personal example: When I dressed as a woman (pre transition) I relaxed, not so much because of how I looked, but it gave me permission to act more naturally. I could sit, move, walk in ways I would not let myself do when acting as a male where I ‘policed’ my movements and actions very carefully to ‘fit in’ (even when on my own).

Acting Cis is Exhausting

One thing that is so very common to all, adults and kids, is that when they can present in the correct gender and act naturally they are more relaxed. less stressed and happier.

Even if just for a short period, being able to drop the 'cis act' reduces stress considerably. Policing yourself to copy other's behaviour to 'fit in' is just exhausting.

This is one way that can help a parent understand their child -- and an adult understand themselves, by having periods of socially transitioning. If someone is demonstrably more relaxed, less stressed and happier doing so, then the odds of them being transgender is pretty damn high.

Appendix from Jack: THE DSM-5 DEFINITION OF GENDER DYSPHORIA

The American psychiatric manual no longer considers gender incongruence (or being transgender) a mental illness. Gender incongruence may and most often will, however, cause suffering. The manual defines gender dysphoria in this way:

Gender dysphoria  refers to the distress that may accompany the incongruence between one's experienced or expressed gender and one's assigned gender. Although not all individuals will experience distress as result of such incongruence, many are distressed if the desired physical interventions by means of hormones and/or surgery are not available. The current term is more descriptive than the previous DSM-IV term gender identity disorder and focuses on dysphoria as the clinical problem, not identity per se. 
The DSM has a long history of homophobia and transphobia and must be read with this in mind. The latest edition (No. 5) represents, however, a long step forward towards depathologizing transgender identities. 


The Pseudo-Science of Autogynephilia

$
0
0
Lisa Mullin, trans woman and trans activist, has actively documented how the so-called "autogynephilia" theory of Ray Blanchard, J. Michael Bailey and Anne Lawrence has been used to invalidate the identities of transgender people, even if the theory is bad science based on debunked stereotypes. 
Lili Elbe, "The Danish Girl", would have to be classified
as an "autoygnephiliac" according to the Blancahrdian
system, which means that she will look masculine
 and have male mannerisms. The fact that none of this
is true, means nothing to the AGP supporters.

In this guest post Lisa gives a clear and succinct summary of "AGP" absurdities.

By Guest Writer Lisa Mullin

Be prepared for sarcasm, but the following is actually all based on what Ray Blanchard, Alice Dreger, J. Michael Bailey etc have stated.

'Autogynephilia' (AGP) is an mysterious ailment with strange symptoms and effects: It is only about sexual desires, no human being (cis or trans) has a gender identity.

Everything an AGP trans woman does is motivated by sex; if  she want to go to a bathroom it is not because they want to pee -- it is only for sexual reasons.

97% to 99% of trans women have it; the rest are just sex mad gay men obsessed about having lots of sex with large numbers of straight men and are "particularly well suited to prostitution". These trans women "shoplift" a lot.

Autogynephilia 

Ray Blanchard's stigmatizing autogynephilia concept (meaning "to love of oneself as a woman") refers to the idea that male to female transgender people (crossdressers and trans women included) who are attracted to women are suffering from a sexual perversion: 

"a man's paraphilic tendency to be sexually aroused by the thought or image of himself as a woman." (1) 

All other trans women are effeminate gay men, according to Blanchard & Co.
If you deny having autogynephilia, it means you have it.

AGP applies to any trans women 'coming out' after puberty starts -- yes, you are an AGP ‘pervert’ at 12.

'EVERY' female attracted trans woman (no matter by how little or how seldom) has it.

'EVERY' trans woman who has had sex with a woman, even if they were (like many gay men) in the closet, trying to be straight and didn't even like it, has it.

If you were NEVER attracted to women, not even once, and were only ever attracted to males but 'came out' as trans after puberty started, you are really AGP (and a 'pseudo' gay).

The condition distorts memories and makes people believe they had trans feelings as a child; no AGP person has ever had trans feelings as a kid.

It distorts memories in trans women to make them believe they never got sexually aroused at 'purely' thinking they were a woman, they always do.

If a trans woman gets aroused at the thought of having sex with someone else, their mind is being distorted and it is really just about them about being self aroused at being a woman.

Female to male trans men can never have it.

Women (straight or lesbian) can never have it.

Gay men can never have it, so if a gay man transitions they don't have it.

Trans women who start life as a gay men and have a positive AGP score are really straight as they are 'pseudo gays'.

Asexual trans women have it, even though they have no sexual interest in anything else.

AGP causes all asexuality in trans women.

A single occurrence in your life means you always have it (even if it was 50 years ago and you were 12 and drunk).

It causes all bisexualty in trans women

Cis bisexual men are all really gay, but bisexual trans women are all really straight (relative to birth sex) and hence have AGP.

Unlike any other sexual paraphilia reducing the sex drive (by using T blockers) does not affect it.

Castration does not affect it.

Removal of penis does not affect it.

It causes, or is caused by (the literature is confused),  transvestic fetishism.

Trans women who deny having it are lying.

EVERY trans kid is really an ’effeminate’ gay man or a ‘butch’ lesbian, if they are natal male and female attracted then they are really AGP and not a trans kid.

If they are natal female and male attracted then we don't talk about that.

Some argue that AGP can start before puberty and before any sexual feelings. Yes, some trans people must really be 'born' with AGP.

J. Michael Bailey, the Donald Trump of sexology, argues that a
man loving trans woman 's "...ability to enjoy emotionally
meaningless sex appears male-typical.  In this sense, homosexual
transsexuals might be especially well-suited to prostitution." Bailey
gets turned on by such women, but find AGP trans women
unattractive. And yes he calls trans women who loves
men "homosexual". All in the name of "science".

Wait, there is more:

Some  supporters of the theory argue that autogynephilia is far, far more than a sexual paraphilia, but an AGP person forms a 'love bond' with their female identity, similar as to how heterosexual men love their wives. Yes, AGP trans women 'pair bond' with an imaginary person created by themselves.

Every trans activist has AGP -- even trans kids like Jazz Jennings. By definition (it seems) being an activist is a symptom of AGP. Non-AGP trans women are all too busy having sex with straight men for money and painting their nails to be activists.

The definition of AGP is so broad that if you applied it to others then:
  • Most cis women would not be classified as ‘really’ female.
  • Many gay men would not be classified as ‘really’ gay but as ‘pseudo’ gays.
  • Many lesbians would not be classified as ‘really’ lesbian but as ‘pseudo’ lesbians.
Proponents of AGP are telepathic and can read trans women's minds and diagnose them with AGP, even from the other side of the world. They have no need for tiresome counselling to determine peoples' thoughts and feelings, a single look at a magazine picture is enough for them to be 100% correct in their diagnosis.

If a bisexual trans woman wants to have sex with a man, the proponents read their mind and can tell that they are not really attracted to the man at all, they are just having an AGP fantasy.

AGP proponents have no need for the normal rules of experimentation, science, logic and statistics. A weak (and questionable) correlation using an incorrect statistical test on a dodgy sample is turned into a ‘100% causality’ by them.

Rules about circular logic do not apply to them, such as ‘trans women's bisexuality is caused by AGP, they are AGP because they are bisexual’.

Occam’s Razor is a quaint affectation to them: AGP now has multiple types, multiple causes with whole new categories being created such as ‘pseudo bisexuality’ or ‘pseudo homosexuality’ or ‘self pair bonding’ ….

Wow, what a condition! We need more work on this unique, like no other sex (or anything actually) related condition in the world...

Then again you could just treat it as stigmatising pseudo-scientific claptrap created to fulfill an ideology originally invented to 'cure sissy boys' of homosexuality, now extended into an anti-trans woman dogma used by social/religious conservatives to argue for the banning of medical support and their total social and legal elimination.

Jack's comment:

For those who do not know the autogynephilia debate, please note that this blog post is dripping with irony. The so-called "facts" presented by Blanchard & Co have all been debunked. The only thing we all agree on, is that transgender people may get excited by the idea of having sex as their target gender. How can they not?

For more on the autogynephilia debate, see:


For references, see:

(1) Blanchard, R. (1989). "The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria". The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 177 (10): 616–623.

On being transgender -- hope and despair

$
0
0
Many transgender people struggle with shame, guilt and self-denial, some to the point of attempting suicide. Monica P. Mulholland's book brings hope to those troubled.
Monica Mulhand (from Newshub New Zealand)


I recommend that you to take a look at Monica P. Mulholland's book Me! The gift of being transgender

Although the book's main focus is on transgender people who have transitioned or intend to transition, it does cover the needs of the whole transgender spectrum.

There is even a chapter on crossdreaming. Most MTF crossdreamers and crossdressers will therefore find something of interest.

Monica herself courageously discusses the dark side of being transgender, including the pain of gender dysphoria, the fear of social exclusion and the possibility of self-harm and suicide attempts.

Many transgender writers avoid this topic, as they fear that writing about it may trigger destructive behavior. I agree with Monica: We need to bring this part of being trans and gender variant out into the open, and talk about it. That is the only way we can bring trans and queer people out of isolation.

Talk about feelings

Monica underlines the need to look at transgender feelings:
"Many who misunderstand the Transgender experience seem to lose sight of the word 'feel'. They may speak about the anatomy and endocrine processes, while dismissing the Transgender person's 'felt' experience as 'personal choice' -- rather than as something physiological. 
"Feelings are an extremely important part of the human condition -- and especially so when trying to understand, and communicate with, a person who is Transgender. If a Transgender person does not feel known, understood, accepted, loved or included, then barriers to feeling of well-being and self-worth negatively impact their communication with those who are most important to them."

41% attempt suicide

It is often the feeling of rejection that leads transgender kids and adults to conclude that they have no other choice but to attempt suicide.

Research shows that 41 percent of transgender people attempt to commit suicide, and even more think about it, so we are facing some extensive social exclusion and marginalization here.

Suicide also affects the friends and families of these people:
"Suicide does not dissolve emotional and physical pain; rather it transfers the pain and suffering to others -- to a parent, a family, a class, a school, a community."
In other words: The invalidation of transgender identities not only hurt transgender people; it may destroy families and local communities.

I am afraid too many of the conversations I have had with crossdreamers and other trans and queer people have revealed that they are struggling with very dark feelings, indeed.

Common ground

An important part of the solution is to humanize the marginalized person; develop some common ground and the recognition that the transgender person is just a person, like everyone else.

Monica puts it this way:
"It is easy to hate or mistreat a person who is instead understood as a stereotype; however, it is hard to hate somebody when you know their story -- their history, what has happened to them, why they are the way they are... Shared experiences, coupled with respectful listening, allow us to develop interpersonal understanding, and to develop our humanity."
Acceptance from others is connected to self-acceptance, Monica puts it this way:
"Self-acceptance sets us free from our own inner critic, and may deflect the criticism of others. I cannot over-emphasize the importance of self-acceptance -- especially when we are not 'perfect' -- as a way to lead a happier and healthier life."
I readily admit that this is one of my own hardest challenges: To learn how to love and respect myself.

Beyond perfection

Monica explains that the drive for the "embodiment of the feminine perfection" can drive trans women into despair. Not even cis women are able to live up to these standards, so how can trans women, who are often marked by the effects of testosterone, do so? The answer is: They often cannot. But then again: That should not be necessary.

Reject stigmatizing models!

Monica does not buy the perverted man in a frock paradigm at all:
"We must not kill ourselves by succumbing to the despair inherent in such a dated stereotype. The image of 'the guy who gets off on deviant sexual practices' is an erroneous concept which has been increasingly called into question, and which is already in the process of undergoing its own transformation into a much more positive and accurate concept -- the Transgender woman who has come home to herself."
She is right, of course; the theories of "transvestic fetishism" and "autogynephilia" belong to the dung heap of history.

And as for the transgender woman who has come home to herself: This may also apply to those who have not transitioned. The message here is self-acceptance.

Monica  argues that we should think of the transgender condition as a gift, instead of a curse. I would add that this also applies to those on the non-binary path.

The Lotus
Photo: aogmember

She points out that for many spiritual seekers, the object is to find out who you really are. Monica points out that many transgender people have an advantage here, in the sense that they already know who they are.

I guess you could say that the dissonance between your assigned gender and whatever it is your heart tells you you are, forces transgender people of all variants to reflect on their identity. For cis people it is taken for granted. They do not think about it, and therefore learn less about this side of themselves.
"We can re-frame out situation so that it many become a positive experience, rather than the process of depletion which uses up our energy, and erodes our self-worth. Like the beautiful Lotus flower -- which has its roots in the muddy bottom of a lake or pond -- our flowering as confident Transgender men and women occurs when we doggedly, and with determination, resolve that we are not only our roots, but rather the lovely flower which so many people find worthy of dignity and respect. 
"By reaching for the sun, and struggling out of the mud and into the sunshine, we define our aspirations and ourselves, and build our lives upon a growing ability to say, "This is ME! I deserve respect for my humanity and my struggle!"
I like the lotus metaphor, but also because it teaches us that that which appears to be bad and shameful -- the mud -- may actually be the source of what is good. The Buddhists say: "No mud, no lorus". This is especially the case for crossdreamers who are told over and over again that their crossdreaming reflects a sinful nature, a mental illness, a perversion.

Unfortunately, in our cultures anything associated with sex becomes mud in the eyes of bigots, and it is used to belittle and harass those that do not live up to their narrow ideas about what constitutes a perfect, vanilla, sexuality. By facing these dreams transgender people may come to realize that their dreams and fantaises reflect an essential and good part of who they are, regardless of whether they transition or not.

Other writers

The book also contains contributions from Jennifer Finney Boyland, Andrea James, Heidi Marlowe, Eliot Davis, Vandy Beth Glenn and me.

All proceeds from the book is donated to Lifeline New Zealand.

See also: On suicide among crossdressers, crossdreamers and other transgender people

Suicide hotlines.





Coping with gender dysphoria without transitioning

$
0
0
Felix Conrad has published a new ebook: How to Jedi Mindtrick Your Gender Dysphoria, containing some pretty useful observations and advice for those MTF crossdreamers who do not go down the road of transitioning.
Felix' inner wise man talking to his inner woman.
(Photo of female Luke Skywalker by MJ MIller.)

The recent interest in transgender issues has been of great help to transgender people of all types.

Yes, the bathroom laws represent a back-clash, but you only get a back-clash when society is changing, and in this case in a much more tolerant direction.

Non-transitioning

There is still one group of transgender people  --- and I am using the term in its broader, umbrella meaning of gender variance here -- who remain invisible, though. Or, at least, less visible.

These are the gender dysphoric transgender people who -- for a wide variety of reasons -- decide not to transition.

This is the group Felix Conrad, our MTF crossdreamer philosopher per excellence, targets in his new book How to Jedi Mindtrick Your Gender Dysphoria.

 Gender Dissonance

Gender dysphoria is, as many of you will know, a feeling of great dissonance between your assigned gender and your sense of self. At its worst, it can be totally incapacitating, and even cause people to take their own lives.

In our survey of transgender people we found that as many as a third of crossdreamers experience severe gender dysphoria. They have a strong sense of female self, and whether they transition or not is not a measure of their gender identity, but more a result of opportunity and ability.

This remains true regardless of what causes the deep felt desire to become a woman. Felix has for a long time expressed the belief that this condition has a biological basis, but in this book he underlines that no one really knows what causes gender dysphoria, and that it does not matter that much for what you do with your life.

To transition or not to transition

Felix does not say that trans people should not transition, and this is important, because this is exactly the kind of book transphobic people will try to use to stop trans people from transitioning: "If Felix can survive without transitioning, you can!"

That is not Felix' point. He argues -- as do I -- that for some people, given their unique circumstances, transitioning is not necessarily the answer. There may be financial, medical, social or psychological factors that stop them from going down that road.

For older transgender people, there is also the question of historical "baggage". It is hard to redefine your very identity in the eyes of others, when you have struggled so hard for so long to adapt to a life you hate.

Passing as a woman

The book is very personal and reflects Felix' own struggle with this issue. He writes about the problem of passing, and the possibility of presenting as the woman you feel you are inside.

In this respect he comes to  a different conclusion than Monica P. Mullholland, whose book I presented in my previous blog post. Monica argues that no woman can live up to society's ideals of feminine beauty, and late transitioning trans women even less so. These trans women will therefore have to move beyond those ideals, and live as themselves in spite of them.

Felix is looking more closely on the "late onset" crossdreamer's own ideals of feminine beauty. The fact that your body -- regardless of modern medicine and modern technology -- cannot embody that dream fully, should make you stop and think before you do something irreversible, he argues.

I do not think there is a simple answer to this dilemma. Each and every transgender person will have to find out for themselves.

To Felix's discussions I would like to add, however, that we should not forget that the question of passing has been one of the most efficient weapons traditionalist medical gate-keepers have used to stop transgender people from getting access to hormones and surgery. In other words: It is used to discipline trans people and force them back into the closet of binary absolutes.

The line between common sense pragmatism and giving in to the "Cistem" is a blurry one, indeed. Like Felix, I have also decided not to transition, but I am not sure about how much of that decision is based on common sense and how much is based on my fear of social exclusion.

I guess Felix' argument would be that social marginalization -- given this day and age -- is a reality, and that we will have to take it into consideration. This will probably change now that more trans people come out when they are younger.

Tell the world you are gender variant

So what do you do if you do not transition? This is where the book gets really interesting.

Felix argues -- convincingly in my opinion -- that the fact that you are not transitioning, should not stop you from admitting to yourself and others that you are, in some fundamental sense, a woman.

Telling others about your feelings are cathartic in itself. It also frees you from having to play the manly man:
"And this is where we start to see that classic transition is no the only way to introduce change and authenticity into a transgender life. My coming out as transgender was nothing more than words -- there was no Versace dress or outwards signs of femininity -- but those words changed the ways my friends view me. Those words were a transitional movement, therefore, and because they marked a shift towards an authentic projection of my gender they helped to reduce gender dysphoria."
The Wildfox sweatshirt,
an example of Felix' non-binary
chillwear.
Felix argues that you can achieve a lot by exploring the non-binary, option. Not in the androgynous sense of the term. You will still identify as a woman. But in the sense of making use of more gender neutral symbols to express that your sense of self. Felix makes use of what he calls "chillwear": female clothing that isn't particularly masculine or feminine, like tracksuits, jumpers, t-shirts etc.

Other rites of passage

Felix also recommends a symbolic "rite of passage" that express your acceptance of your own sense of self.

For those who transition this may be the day the letter changed on their licence, the day they started hormones, the day they went full time etc.:

"Transgender people like me and you -- non transitioners -- have jack-diddly. Our transformation and realisation of gender is an internal event. We are the Buddhist monks of gender variance, travelling shaven headed with no possessions but the enlightenment we carry inside."
Felix found a tree in the forest and carved a symbol which represented his "truegender" onto the trunk.

As part of his "transition light" options he also includes the possibility of exercising (getting a healthier body) and taking hormones.

Happiness beyond gender

Felix' approach does not guarantee happiness. He does, in fact, argue that nothing you do with respect to gender will ever make you happy. He says:
"An awesome life includes good health, friends, love and a stimulating job. Yes, i know these things are difficult to get, but that's what the rest of your life is for, Jedi..."
I cannot argue with that.

To conclude

We have finally come to the point where we are able to make the lives on non-transitioning trans people visible. That is a huge step forward.

I am sure this book will be of help to many caught in the limbo between living as a man and feeling that they are a woman. Read it!

When Real Life Gets in the Way of Transphobic Science

$
0
0
Gigi Gorgeous first came out as a gay man, then
as a trans woman, and now as a lesbian, falsifying
the autogynephilia theory in the process.
Two recent articles and a YouTube blog post present lives that prove the stereotypes of transphobic psychologists wrong. 

Meet Ekundayo Afolayan, Gigi Gorgeous and Kat Hamilton!

Sexology has caused a lot of suffering in queer and transgender circles.

Since the late 1980s terms like "transvestic fetishism" have been used actively to invalidate the  identities of male to female transgender people, mostly by reducing their sense of self to some kind of sexual perversion.

The clearest example is the the autogynephilia theory of Ray Blanchard, which is based on traditional gender stereotypes and a strict binary understanding of sex, sexuality and gender.

He is basically reducing sexuality, gender expression as well as gender identity in male to female trans people to a function of sexual attraction. In other words:  Who you are attracted to determines what kind of transgender person you are. And male to female transgender persons are either effeminate gay men or mentally ill straight men, according to this theory.

In real life there is no one to one relationship between sexual orientation on the one hand and masculinity and femininity on the other.

In real life there is no clear boundary between male to female transgender people who love women and those who love men, neither when it comes to appearance, behavior, desires nor when they first become aware of their gender variance.
Modern sexology often reduces the identity and
sexuality of trans and queer people to
"autoeroticism", a strategy used to invalidate
gay, lesbian and transgender people for more
than a century. (Thinkstock)

But that is exactly what the theory requires.

"Homosexual transsexuals" (this is what these researchers offensively call straight trans women who love men) are described as effeminate and sexy young transitioners, while "autogynephilic transsexuals" (i.e homosexual and bisexual trans women) are masculine, unattractive,  and "late-onset".

Actually, this binary encompasses non-transitioning transgender persons as well, including drag queens and crossdressers.

I am not going to repeat the main arguments against the theory here. You will find ample documentation here and here.

In this post I will present three recent publications made by people who all violate the borders set up by Ray Blanchard.

Ekundayo Afolayan and non-binary gender variance

Afolayan's avatar over at The Establishment
Since I started my blog back in 2008, a lot has happened.

One of the most interesting developments is the increasing visibility of non-binary people who want to express their gender variance through clothing, behavior and various forms of body add-ons or modifications.

Many of them have been assigned female at birth.

To express the male or masculine side of themselves, the latter  often make use of binders (to hide their breasts) and penis prosthetics (to gain that bulge or erection).

They do not normally use the language of male to female crossdreamers to describe their feelings, but it is abundantly clear that the desire to appear masculine to the point of "packing" is an important way for them to express both identity and sexuality.

This is why I found Ekundayo Afolayan's article about their search for the perfect penis so interesting.

Afolayan is intersex, black and queer. They are passing as female, and have been raised as female.

They fall completely outside the traditional category of the old, white, "transvestic male fetishist," yet this is what they write:
"If I were just looking for a sex toy, I would have my pick of silicone dicks in every size and every color of the rainbow. But I’m looking for something that will help me express myself, my gender, and my sexuality, and that means no sparkly purple monster wangs. I want it to be be brown, like me. I want my dildo at a size that won’t absolutely obliterate my partner’s parts (like the Cannon). I need something that feels as real as it can get—something that can be worn flaccid or erect, something I can use to pee, something that lets me ejaculate."
There is no big difference between this desire and many MTF crossdreamer's experimentation with tucking, stuffed bras and breast forms.   Like them, they make use of the tools available to express and explore their sexuality and their gender.

This should be impossible according to the theory, as only straight cis men can experience such feelings. People like her do not exist, according to Blanchard. 

There are, in fact, a lot of female to male crossdreamers out there (who get aroused by the idea of being a man or taking the sexual role of a man).  Plenty.

Gigi Gorgeous - from coming out as a gay man to coming out as  lesbian 

Gigi Gorgeous is the kind of trans activist that makes some other trans activists uncomfortable by her rather explicit, feminine, gender expression.
Photo by @gigigourgeous at instagram.

In Norway we have several non-transgender female "pink bloggers" who reminds me of her way of expressing herself. People may object to their sexualization of womanhood, but no one would deny them their female identity.

As a good-looking, feminine, early transitioner, Gigi would immediately be classified as a "homosexual transsexual", according to the autogynephilia scheme of things.

You see, she has always been attracted to men, and if you are attracted to men you are not supposed to be an "autogynephiliac" or a "transvestic fetishist", according to the theory.

However, the hearts of men and women do not really care that much about Ray Blanchard and his theory. A few weeks ago Gigi came out on YouTube as a lesbian. She has fallen in love with a woman!

I guess the autogynephilia-supporters are hastily reclassifying Gigi as an "autogynephiliac", arguing that she had always been one, since any trans woman who has ever had sex with a woman is per definition a "paraphiliac" in their eyes.

Still, that does not explain how she is able to live up to all the other stereotypes of Blanchard & Co: Appearing sexy and attractive, transitioning young, expressing feminine mannerisms etc. etc. She first came out as a gay man.

The truth is, of course, that the whole theory is just a projection of an 19th century classification scheme developed to uphold the binary. They old bearded professors of that time believed  -- like Blanchard -- that gay men were "inverts", mentally ill men who mirrored female sexuality.

Real world sexuality and gender identity are not binary. They unfold themselves in a complex and multidimensional continuum of desire, identity, interest, expressions and abilities.



Kat Hamilton - a feminist who loves rough sex

The autogynephilia theory is based on the idea that the sexual desires of "non-homosexual" male to female trans persons represent a kind of misdirected straight, male, sexuality. All of them are straight men who feel a sexual attraction to their "inner woman".

One clear sign of this "erotic target location error" is that they get aroused by the idea of being a sexy woman, because this is something non-transgender women never do, according to Blanchard & Co.

The fact is, however, that in real life non-transgender women may also get turned on by "feeling sexy." They are not supposed to say so, of course, but many of them admit as much.

This should come as no surprise. Sexual desire is not a simple trigger/response process where we get turned on by looking at body parts. Sexual desire relies just as much on the feedback we get from others. To be desired by someone is a turn-on in itself, because it affirms our own attractiveness, which again makes real sex a real possibility.
The desire for sexual submission causes a lot of
guilt both in transgender circles and among
cisgender feminists.
Photo: Moussa81

Kat Hamilton's article is fascinating, because as a feminist she clearly believes that  getting turned on by the idea of being affirmed by a man is problematic. Or -- for that matter -- getting aroused  by the idea of being the submissive one in bed -- having "rough sex" with a dominant man.

She writes:
"Domination is all in the actions, the movements, micro-insinuations, and the placement of hands and body parts with clear intent and control. It's a delicate dance with someone who knows how to lead. That carnal feeling that somebody wants me, desires me, and finds me sexy is something new to me that I never felt growing up. Being teased for being petite and flat chested—I'm still currently working with 32A cup breasts—I never got chosen for seven minutes in heaven, and throughout my teen and adult years I had sex with my shirt on or at the very least a bra. It took me a very long time to feel sexy, and even then it's not all of the time."
Please remember: If a male to female transgender person says something like this, it is immediately taken as proof of some "autoerotic paraphilia". But it isn't. Hamilton is simply exploring a side of her sexuality that is natural. It is neither good nor bad in itself. It simply is.

And we should all be allowed to explore the different aspects of our sexualities and our identities, without shame and guilt, keeping the distinction between sexual fantasies and what happens in bed in mind, as well as the difference between what happens in and out of bed. Being submissive in bed is not the same as being submissive elsewhere.

Ekundayo Afolayan, Gigi Gorgeous and Kat Hamilton are real persons, living real lives outside the narrow boundaries defined by sexologists like Blanchard. Keep them in mind the next time you meet religious extremists or transphobic "radical feminists" (TERFs) who actively use such theories to attack crossdreamers and trans people.

The Crossdreamer Portal gets its own domain

$
0
0
This blog has several sister sites, one of which is the Crossdreamer Portal.
Photo: Photos.com

I have gathered links and feeds to a lot of blogs and sites that cover crossdreamers and transgender issues.

Unfortunately it has, for historical reasons, been presented under the rather unfortunate URL: autogynephilia.blogspot.com.

It made sense to use that address at the time, as most crossdreamers would find crossdreamer sites by searching for "autogynephilia".

However, I am no longer able to live with the fact that the URL refers to this toxic, transphobic, theory.

From today on you will find The Crossdreamer Portal over atcrossdreamers.org!  

(The old URL will continue to work).

Female to male crossdreaming - the Max Wolf Valerio story

$
0
0
Crossdreaming is often considered something that male to female crossdressers engage in only.
Dreaming of becoming Thor.
Drawn by Jack Kirby.
It is the sexual arousal that gives them away. Apparently regular straight women or trans men do not get those kind of feelings. It has been described as a kind of misdirected straight male sexuality.

I believe I have documented quite thoroughly on this blog this that crossdreaming -- i.e. getting excited by imagining yourself as "the other sex" or your target sex -- is quite common among a lot of transgender and queer people, including female to male transgender people, lesbians,  gay men and homosexual trans men (i.e. trans men who love men).

I am currently reading the fascinating book The Testosterone Files, by Max Wolf Valerio, a female to male heterosexual transsexual. Max started out presenting as a lesbian woman, and loves women.

The book gives a fascinating glance into his exploration of his male identity and how he has to handle both stereotypical and not so stereotypical male behavior.


He also discusses the way testosterone therapy affected his psyche. Most of the life stories from FTM trans men point in the same direction: The testosterone does not change their identity, but it does affect the way they experience the world. As Max sees it, biology definitely plays a role in gender identity development.

Max Wolf Valerio, photo by Valentino Vecchietti.
Max also tells a story about crossdreaming (even if he does not use this word).

As for many male to female crossdreamers, his sexual fantasies of being his target sex is colored by popular culture, in his case comic books.

He was the only "girl" around trading Thor, Fantastic Four, The X-Men, Spiderman and The Incredible Hulk.
"I want to look like these superheroes -- muscular, svelte, great in tights and a synthetic bodysuit! I spend hours drawing their perfect, well-muscled forms, contemplating with awe what it would be like to possess their agility, speed, fantastic legs, and great biceps. It's the same excitement that I'll feel overtake me when I run across ads in magazines where a confident, brawny muscleman tells all the ninety-nine-pound weaklings of the world that they can get great bodies and wow the chicks. How could I have that? There must be a way. I want it so much I could burst. 
"And I look and dream, counting up my allowance to that I can send away for one of those muscle-building manuals. I'm not completely aware that I'm in actuality -- a little girl. A girl with long, thin legs and cat's eye glasses, transforming herself into a muscleman in her imagination. The possibility feels so real, I barely realize I'm imagining it."
This is the perfect mirror fantasy of a male to female crossdreamer. (I remember vividly dreaming about being Supergirl!) These fantasies represent the awakening of Max' male identity.

In other words: Crossdreaming is found in all trans and queer subgroups. It is not an effect of a misdirected "straight male sexuality." It is, rather, and expression of a real  and strong cross-gender identification.

That does not mean that all of them are transsexual (in the sense of wanting or needing to transition), but they have this in common, which tells me that we are not talking about distinct categories here, but continuums.

By the way: Max did get the body he longed for.

See Alchetron for more about Valerio.


 Max Valerio reads his poem Nocturnal Pump.




On Quantum Desire and why we need a new sexology of gender variance

$
0
0
Felix Conrad pondering the sexuality of
gender variance.
(Photo: elwynn1130)

Felix Conrad, spiritual leader of the Transcend Movement and crossdreamer philosopher per excellence, has written a new book on sexuality and gender variance called Quantum Desire


Antonia has asked him a few questions.

ANTONIA: Is it really necessary you write another book on crossdreaming? What’s this...the hundredth?

FELIX: I’ll ignore that! Anyway..it’s the ninety eighth.. Yes...absolutely necessary. Most of my work has been about the seismic tremors of a transgender awakening: trying to understand why I feel that I’m a woman...how valid is that feeling... and how I can live with it? So, basically, they’re about transgender psychology. This book deals with gender variance as a sexological phenomenon.

ANTONIA: And why the change?

FELIX: It’s a question of survival really. The transgender crisis screwed with my mental health and I had to sort it out...and I sort my head out out by writing. Now that I’ve turned a corner with my gender issues I can write something that’s been on my ‘to do’ list for quite some time: a sexological analysis of crossdreaming.

Also, I think that one of the fascinating things I’ve discovered recently is that when I got on top of my gender issues I started to see my desire to change gender as more of a sexual thing. Now, I don’t want to overstate that...because I’ve been irrevocably changed by my transgender awakening - but something’s shifted. It’s this quality of gender variant sexuality that gave me the book’s title: Quantum Desire; as fucking crazy as this may sound...it seems that the way you observe our sexuality can change it.

ANTONIA: But come on Felix, don’t be shy...that’s not the only reason you wrote it...hasn’t there been a certain Spanish beauty who started off this quest?


FELIX: Well, I always try to include a real life situation, and yes, explaining my sexuality to my new girlfriend occasioned this book...but it was a long time coming. 

Despite decades of research, commentary, blogging and scientific papers...nobody can say a damn thing about gender variant sexuality with any certainty or without controversy. That’s a scandal...and the main reason is that self-obsessed transgender people like me have cannibalized all the analysis focusing on the transgender angle and our interminable battle with Mister [Ray] Blanchard.

The fact is that there are millions of crossdreamers who have no transgender identity and who simply want to understand their sexual behaviour.
Ray Blanchard came up with the autogynephilia theory, which
says that all male to female transgender who are attracted
to women suffer from a paraphilia (sexual perversion).
Photo: Maxine Petersen

Furthermore, there’s also many trans-leaning people who just aren’t satisfied with politically correct transgender explanations of their sexuality. It’s high time we got together as a community and made some serious decisions about what is the appropriate scientific name for our sexuality, what is the appropriate sexological label and other such questions.

ANTONIA: Ahhh...you mention Mister Blanchard. Tell me...you often joke about secretly believing Blanchard is right…let me ask you frankly: do you secretly believe Blanchard is right?

FELIX: Listen, Antonia...if I say to you...faggots like to fuck each other up the ass? Am I right?

ANTONIA: Well...err...kind of...but I want to punch you in the face.

FELIX: Exactly. Some of Blanchard’s observations are correct, but they’re intentionally and clearly framed in such a way linguistically to inflict the maximum damage on trans people. 

Obviously, as an academic he can’t say ‘fucking’ and ‘faggot’ but by choosing terms like ‘paraphilia’ and endlessly focusing on the masculine frames and faces of older trans women he’s doing the same thing. 

I have no problem with theories which postulate the sexual origins of transgender identity but there’s ways to formulate those theories that are respectful and ways that are a kick in the nuts. Blanchard went for the nuts.

ANTONIA: Hold on a minute...are you saying that Blanchard was right but he was just rude about it?

FELIX: Certainly not. Autogynephilia rests upon a causal relationship between the sexual desire to transition and any subsequent transition. This is not only impossible to prove but even if it was -- with no clear explanation of why they had that sexual desire in the first place -- there’s no reason why the sexual urge didn’t originate from a female gender core or other attribute of genuine feminine essence. 

However, saying that...and it kills me to say it...the fact is that until we come up with a credible, plausible and compelling sexological narrative to replace autogynephilia, Blanchard will continue to be a large part of the conversation.

ANTONIA: You really think so?

FELIX: Well, look...we’re talking about him..and the cunt hasn’t written a word for thirty years...so we can’t claim to have trumped his narrative. That’s why I really wanted to write Quantum Desire. 

Like all my books, it’s just an extended conversation...not academic research...but I hope I can inspire serious researchers to put aside the trans-centric debate and get down to writing a seminal work of sexology on crossgender arousal.

ANTONIA: Ahh...but as I’m sure people are wondering, Felix...is it possible to write a purely sexological account of crossgender arousal?

FELIX:
Well, that is one of the questions the book answers. The simple answer is...no...but you can certainly write one that focuses more on sexological discourse than gender theory.

ANTONIA: And what do you think readers will find most surprising about this book?.

FELIX: The sheer cheek of the final chapter. Basically, I attempt to reconcile the unreconcilable: sexological explanations of gender variance with feminine essence..and to be honest, I think I did a pretty good job.

ANTONIA:
Well, your readers will be the judge of that. Now I’d like you to tell us about this ‘crossdreamer challenge’ you’ve been talking about.

FELIX: Ok. Well, I really think that the crossdreamer community is a place where we can make genuine progress on understanding our complex sexuality. We stand on a bridge between the fetishists, scurrying around doing whatever it is they do - masturbating 80 times a day on tumblr, desperately asserting they’re not women...and snooty transfolk claiming to be above all that fetish nonsense.

Well, we can also masturbate 80 times a day but still claim to be women...or not...because the defining characteristic of this community is that as long as you don’t have a stupid name with too many consonants like you can say whatever you want. We accept gender variance and sexual variance and if anyone’s gonna make inroads into the theoretical and practical issues that need to be resolved...it’s us.

So, I was kind of thinking that everyone could formulate their own answers to the questions in my book. So...it would be super cool if they left in the ‘comments’ section their thoughts about the following….

Crossdreaming is a great colloquial term, but what should be the scientific name for our sexuality?

What is its correct sexological label: Fetish? Paraphilia? Orientation? A.N.Other?

What is the best narrative we can use to briefly and comprehensively describe our sexuality to someone outside of our community?

ANTONIA:What the fuck is this. Homework? Sorry...only joking.

FELIX: It’s just...I think that maybe we can decide this stuff as a community. Maybe a majority view will begin to emerge and we can all adopt the same terminology.

ANTONIA: Sounds a bit like a referendum to me...and you know how that goes down.

FELIX:
Shit...I never thought of that. Imagine...80% of respondents on Jack’s website vote for ‘autogynephilia’ as the best term for our sexuality. A crossdrexit.
Photo: Martin Poole

ANTONIA: Jack would have kittens! Sorry! What? Why are you looking at me like that?

FELIX:
Sorry...I was just imagining Jack having kittens.

ANTONIA:
What like...in the reproductive sense...not in the English idiom sense?

FELIX: Yeah.

ANTONIA: You are so fucking weird!

Quantum Desire: A Sexological Analysis of Crossdreaming is available on Amazon

More books by Felix Conrad.

Jack will publish a review of the book in the near future!

A Short History of the Roots of Transphobic Science

$
0
0
While preparing a comment on Felix Conrad's new book, Quantum Desire: A Sexological Analysis of Crossdreaming, I realized that many of the cultural problems facing queer and trans peope have roots in one particular way of looking at sex, sexuality and gender, a view that has been abandoned by most serious researchers and trans activists, but which nevertheless shapes the way we think about queer and gender variant people.

Here is a short and simplified summary of my interpretation of this history. For references and alternative interpretations, see the list of books included below!
A real and decent Victorian lady (or so
we are meant to believe).

We need to understand history

I believe that if we are to liberate ourselves from the prejudices of old science, we need to know how we got into this mess in the first place.

We need to understand that there is nothing given or self-evident about the way psychiatry and psychology has presented crossdreamers and other queer and transgender people.  I believe historical studies can make us wiser in this respect.

Victorian prejudices

It seems to me that the most important historical change causing the stigmatization of trans people is rooted in new ideas about womanhood that arose in the late 19th century.

At the time, the men of power basically decided that real women, decent women, civilized women, were weak and intellectually inferior, with little or no libido.

Strong sexual desire was a masculine thing, something that drove real men to conquering passive women and prove themselves in the field of battle.

The women  therefore had to be kept in their homes with their children, protected by good men from lecherous men.

Curing hysteria

For a humorous look at the Victorian ideas about female sexuality I recommend the British comedy Hysteria from 2011.



As the movie shows us, a lot of doctors did not believe that there was such a thing as a female orgasm. They did meet a lot of women complaining about fatigue and frustration, however, a condition they believed was caused by an unstable uterus. They therefore came up with a massage therapy to help the uterus get into its proper position and relieve the suffering of these women.

As the movie so brilliantly demonstrates, having a handsome young doctor massage your vagina, may heal a woman's frustration. Or at least for a while, until the problems reappear and you have to go back to the same doctor for a new round of massage. A lot of doctors became very rich because of this.

Indeed, they got so tired of being masseurs that one of them invented the electric vibrator.

By all means, there were doctors and scientists who understood that the sense of relief was sexual in nature, but it was not until the vibrators appeared in the pornographic movies of the 1920s that this practice disappeared. Moreover, I am talking about the dominant ideas of the Powers that Be here. There was a lot of diversity in 19th century ideas about female sex and sexuality, as there is now.

The birth of the asexual woman

In the Renaissance the idea that decent women were practically asexual would have been considered crazy. At that time the dominant idea was that women were the really libidnous ones, while the men were the calm and rational leaders who kept civilization together.

But then again, at that time nearly all women worked in the field or in the markets. You could see them in their "natural environment", which made it impossible to uphold any idea of the completely chaste and asexual woman -- at least outside the mostly mythic realm of Catholic saints.

But by the early 20th century the "proper" women of the bourgeoisie were to be like the Virgin Mary: Chaste, demure, compassionate, but with no real sexuality of their own and the onely sexual activity was said to be undertaken in order to satisfy their husband.

I guess it had something to do with the fact that these "decent" women (unlike "crude" farmers and working class women) had to stay at home, making it easier to protect them from other men. If they were made to believe they had no libido, they were less likely to fool around with the gardener.

In this way sexual dreams and fantasies became a male thing. Any male to female transgender person who admitted to dreaming about having sex as their target gender would therefore indirectly admit that they were, in fact, men.

Sin becomes biology

There was another 19th century cultural invention, besides the "asexualization" of women, that also contributed to the stigmatization of transgender sexuality: Modern medicine now took an interest in the proper sexual behavior of men and women.

Before this time, few would argue that proper sexuality was defined by nature. They were farmers. They could see that their bulls were licking each others... whatever.

Proper sex was not defined by nature. Instead decent sexual behavior was a legal matter, defined by scripture and the law. The law was established by God and King in order to keep society in order.

The new masters of science, however, translated their religious prejudices into biology. While the Old Testament God had said sex was there for procreation and for filling the world and governing it (which is partly why same-sex sex and masturbation was considered a sinful waste of divine potential), the late 19th/early 20th century doctors defended the exact same conclusion on the basis of evolutionary arguments.

If the white male was to rule and control savages all over the world, there was a need for a culling of the White race. There was no need for people who wasted their energies on meaningless sex and masturbation. You cannot build empires on the basis of sensual pleasure. Or so they thought.

So, a misreading of Darwin led to the idea that sex beyond the male/female missionary position was bad, because it undermined proper society. Heck, it might even cause the sexually prolific "savages" to take over the world, as they were producing more children.

According to this world view both same-sex desire and transgender dreams were forbidden, because they undermined procreation, the patriarchy and the war effort.

It is no coincidence that Ray Blanchard, the creator of the toxic autogynephilia theory, uses procreation as a basis for his understanding of non-pathological sex. 

Gender variance becomes a mental illness

The "biologization" of sexuality caused transgender fantasies to become a mental disease, as opposed to a sin. Some of the doctors meant well and wanted to help, but the disease paradigm meant that there were only two types of cure for male to female transgender people:

(1) To stop fantasizing and become a proper man or (2) move over to the other side completely and take over the role of the perfect housewife stereotype, hiding the fact that you did have a past presenting as a man.

To the extent the system did try to help trans people, it was by moving them from one closet to a new one, where no one could see that they had ever been living as the other gender.

Indeed, in many cases the doctors recommended that trans women moved to another city, abandoning their friends in order to blend into society as non-transgender women. The helpers helped erase the existence of transgender people by helping them.

Sex without sex

What all this meant was that sexuality got separated from gender identity.

Male to female trans people were caught between Scylla and Charybdis. You could either sign up for the feminine essence theory -- which postulated that since all (decent) women are the same, a proper trans woman had to be a stereotypical (decent) woman "trapped in a man's body" -- OR you had to accept the fact that you were some kind of male pervert, a gay man or a fetishist.

The female to male transgender people faced a similar dilemma. Identifying with or as men they were expected to be sexually aggressive, but since friends, family, colleagues and therapists continued to see them as women, admitting to such fantasies were problematic also for them.

I know of FTM trans men who were denied hormones at the University Clinic in Oslo because they admitted that they had erotic fantasies about having a male body. I am not sure about this, but it seems that the narrative of the creepy male to female transvestite had contaminated the doctor's understanding of female to male trans people as well.

Feminist fallacy

I am afraid the more recent "post-structuralist" approach of modern feminism and so-called gender studies have reinforced the divide between sexualy desire and gender identity.

By separating sex (as in biology) on the one hand, from sex (as in sexuality)  and sex (as in gender identity) on the other, some of these thinkers have reinforced the idea that gender identity has nothing to do with sexuality. They consier it a "social construct" anchored in culture and language, completely decoupled from biology.

Some so-called "radical feminists" even make use of the fetish theory to repeat the old dogma that only men can be sexual perverts, and that any male assigned person who dreams about being a woman is a sexual pervert, a fetishist or an "autogynephiliac". The old sexist belief system of the 19th century reappears where you would least expect it: Among women fighting the patriarchy.

I should add, though, that the majority of radical feminists are pro-trans. Their narrative makes it hard, however, for crossdreamers to recognize their own feelings and experiences.

We should keep in mind that we are all children of patriarchal society, and that this colors the fantasies of both male to female and female to male crossdreamers. Their dreams are therefor easily intepreted as misgynistic perversions, rather than what they really are: Their psyche's desperate attempt at making sense of a sense of self that does not fit the gender expectations of society.

Reuniting sexuality and gender identity

In  Quantum Desire: A Sexological Analysis of Crossdreaming, Felix argues that we have to develop a new sexology, our own sexology, that is able to reunite sexuality and the various forms of gender identity. I believe he is right. That will be the topic of my next blog post.

See also:

What Dr. Zhana Vrangalova Taught Me About Transphobia in Science
How psychiatry and psychology have been used to suppress gender variance
'Hysteria' and the Long, Strange History of the Vibrator

Books on the history of sex, gender and transgender

Why we need a new narrative for transgender sexuality and crossdreaming

$
0
0
I have been reading Felix Conrad's new ebook on crossdreaming and sexology. Well written, interesting and provocative, as always. This post will not be so much a review of the book as a commentary on what it covers. We agree that we need a new narrative that makes sense of the sexuality of crossdreamers and other trans people.

Felix' main point in Quantum Desire: A Sexological Analysis of Crossdreaming is that we need a new sexology for crossdreaming and transgender thinking.

We need a new model, a new narrative, a new way of thinking about sexual desire and gender variance, because right now we are far too busy reacting to the belief systems of old:

You know, the ones that sort gender variant people into categories like "effeminate gay men" and "autogynephiliacs", "real trans women" and "fetishists", people "trapped in the wrong bodies" and "sexual perverts".

We are lacking a new synthesis

The fact that we are arguing against the old is inevitable. This is how human thought evolves. To use the vocabulary of Hegel: We start out with one way of looking at the world (thesis), which is then challenged by another (antithesis) until the world moves on to a third position (synthesis).

What we are lacking is the synthesis. Felix does not provide us with that new model in the book, or at least not fully, but he gives as a pretty good idea about where we have to go.

If I understand him correctly we have to get to the point where we discuss the sexuality and sexual desires of queer and gender variant people freely and openly. We have to get to a point where we are able to make those fantasies an integrated part of transgender identities of all kinds (and I use the word transgender here as an umbrella term for all types of gender variance here).

Right now sexual fantasies of the crossdreamer kind are considered invalidating not only for transsexual women and men -- who have transitioned or who want to do so -- but also for non-transitioning transgender people (including those genderqueer, crossdressing, drag  and more).


An extremely short history of transphobic science

I believe that if we are to liberate ourselves from the prejudices of old science, we need to know how we got into this mess in the first place.

When preparing this blog post I ended up writing so much about the history of transphobic science that I had to turn in into a separate blog post.

In that post I identified three historical trends from the late 19th century onward that has made crossdreaming toxic in the eyes of many:
  • The idea that women (or at least "decent" women") are less libidinous or sexual than men. This means that male to female transgender people who admit to having sexual desires about becoming their target gender are immediately classified as men.
  • The medicalization of transgender feelings. While transgender transgressions might have been considered a sin or a violations of laws, gender variance was not considered a mental disease until the late 19th century. Transgender and queer people have, since then, been easily dismissed as mentally ill.
  • This caused a decoupling of sexuality from gender identity, especially in the case of femininity and female identities, which makes it impossible to understand the role of sexual desire in transgender lives.
"What do you mean: I need to have sex on
my wedding night? Yuck! All I wanted
was a white wedding!"
Photo: Dreampictures
Within this framework the only kind of sexual fantasies a trans woman can admit to is vanilla woman  romantically in love with a man scenarios. Nothing out of the ordinary, please...(in spite of the fact that most cis people have kinky erotic fantasies.)

Indeed, I hear, over and over again, from some therapists and some transgender people, that gender identity has nothing to do with sexuality.

I realize that some of them refer to the fact that there is no one to one relationship between a trans person's target gender and their sexual orientation. This is, of course, true. But I often find that this idea is extended to sexuality and sexual fantasies in general.

Sex without sex

I must admit I find the concept of a gender identity decoupled from the deep biological drives of sexuality bizarre.

By all means, I do see the advantage of having a separate word for the cultural side of  male and female -- i.e. the ideas and concepts we use to understand the difference between men and women.

To use the word gender (which was originally a term taken from grammar) for this purpose is useful, because it reminds us that what we consider typical male and female behavior and personality traits cannot be reduced to biology (i.e. biological sex) and instincts alone.

Still, we have to keep in mind that the concept of cultural gender is exactly that: a concept we use to interpret the world. Gender is not something tangible "out there". The existence of the concept does not mean that biology has no effect on gendered behavior, feelings or traits.

Nor does it mean that biological sex, and the dynamics of sexuality, has no effect on how we understand ourselves as gendered beings: as men, women or something else.

The biologists are right in pointing out the similarities between human sex and sexuality and the ones of animals. We are animals as well. We have inherited similar instincts, and I find it completely unreasonable to believe that these instincts have no effect on the way we dream, the way we act.

Our concept of the horny teenager may be a social construct, but the hormones that drive that teenager to do what he or she does are not.

More than procreation

Some biologists derail the discussion, however, when they try to reduce this instinctual side of sex and sexuality to procreation. There is much more to sex than this.


Video on the sex life of our closest relative, the bonobos. Nor suitable for a work environment!

The frolicking bonobos are frolicking because their frolicking serves as a social glue and a conflict solver. Or, as the bonobos  probably would say (if they could be bothered to learn English), because it feel so good. They have sex with everyone, regardless of age or gender, so this is clearly not about procreation alone.

On top of that we, the bonobos, the baboons and most other primates are social beings, and our survival depends on the support of our local community, our tribe and our family.

The reason young boys and girls seek out
gender typical toys is not because they are
wired for war or child care; it is because
they are wired to seek out a place as
men or women, regardless of what the
local culture defines as proper gender behavior.
No wonder young girls and boys spend so much time trying out gender roles and gender expressions. They are, among other things,  trying to find out what behavior will give them social acceptance and ensure their belonging.

And they may not know it yet, but they are also preparing for an adult life as a sexual being, where their ability to find both a sexual partner, love and a family depends on them being accepted as a good partner.

I suspect our sexual fantasies are created at the crossroads between our inner instinctual drives and the need to adapt to our surroundings.

In any case: This is about so much more than procreation, but sex as in sexuality is definitely an important part of gender.

Sex is the problem of transgender

I would argue that the main problem for nearly trans people is that their lives have become negatively defined by their sexuality.

Their sexual desire condemns them, which is why they often end up in three equally unsatisfying positions:
  • Denying their sexual desires, becoming "real transsexuals" whose male past becomes some kind of unreal mirage.
  • Denying their sexual desires and suppressing their gender variance, playing the roles of "real non-transgender men" or "real cis women" in the hope of gaining the love and respect of so-called normal people.
  • Wholeheartedly embracing the sexual side of their gender variance, reducing it to a fetish or a kink, while playing the part of the cultural rebel.
Their sexual desire is never considered a natural part of them being some shade of  transgender.

Gender identity reduced to a perversion

Ironically, this has left the door open to exactly the kind of researchers that want to reduce transgender identities to some kind of derailed sexuality, being that a kind of homosexuality or a fetishistic perversion.

In this book, as in others, Felix aggressively and convincingly deconstructs concepts like autogynephilia, transvestic fetishism, masochistic emasculation, which all try to reduce crossdreaming to a sexual aberration.
Crossdressing can be seen as the psyche's way
of expressing a gender identity and/or
traits like masculinity/femininity.
Photo: Discovod

For instance:
"Transvestic fetishism is the reduction of everything we feel and experience...to a fetish for playing'dress up'. Not only is it insulting but it shows a remarkable lack of acumen. You don't have to be a master psychologist to figure that clothing is just a prop to channel a deeper lust for womanhood."
And those who have read some of the other of Felix' books will know that he does not accept that the erection an MTF experiences while imagining themselves as a woman is proof of a male sexuality:
"The lifeblood of MtF crossgender sexuality is being, in some form or another, female...therefore we must necessarily become female in our fantasies."
Transgender does not necessarily mean transitioning

That does not mean that Felix believes that all MTF crossdreamers are transsexual or that they should  transition. In this book he argues, more strongly than ever, that he does not believe transitioning should be considered the obvious solution to gender dysphoria:
"To be honest, I do think we've gone a little over the top with the whole trans thing, and I'm deeply skeptical about transition as the best cure for gender dysphoria...but any harm that results from our condition comes because the medical and psychiatric community haven't found the best way to cure gender dysphoria."
I am not so sure about this. I think transitioning can often be a good and legitimate response to severe gender dysphoria, and that this will also be the case in the future.

But I do think that a more tolerant and understanding society (the medical establishment included) will make it unnecessary for some other trans people to transition. And a new and more tolerant sexology will remove science from the arsenal of aggressive transphobes, leaving trans people more room to find our and decide for themselves.

In other words: We have to let go of the concept of the asexual "true" transsexual as well. It has become a straight-jacket that stops us all from coming to terms with the complexity of transgender sexualities and identities.

I still think the metaphor "a woman trapped in a man's body" makes sense as a metaphor, though. It describes the intense dysphoria of some transgender people well.

Where some doctors and trans activists go wrong is when they interpret the metaphor literally: as if there was some kind of complete miniature stereotype woman sitting somewhere in their brain, dreaming of dresses, knitting and home baked cookies.

Both Felix and I speculate that we have some kind of inborn female orientation that compels us to orient ourselves in the world as women. But this brain based driver is not a complete program for female interests, abilities and behaviors. I do not think cis women are born with that kind of "software" either. I see far too much variation for that to be the case.

My hunch is that what we have in common is this need to orient ourselves in the world as women, and to express ourselves as women, and that sexuality is an integrated part of this orientation. It seems to me Felix is saying something similar.

There is light at the end of the tunnel

I am glad to say important players in the transgender community have moved on. In one way you might say that the openness and tolerance found in the other strand of sexology, the one I would like to call the humanist one, is getting the upper hand (the tradition of researchers like Magnus Hirschfeld, Harry Benjamin and Alfred Kinsey).

In spite of what Felix seems to imply in the book, most trans activists -- including Julia Serano -- do not believe in a "feminine essence". They openly discuss much more complex and diverse models of sex, gender and identity, where a transgender gender identity may -- for instance -- grow out a complex interplay between biological, cultural and personal factors.

Health care professionals are also coming around to a more nuanced view of sex and gender, arguing that since we now accept that women have sexual desires and fantasies (and may even act on them,) it is also OK for male to female transgender people to do the same.

In Norway, the legal side of gender identity is taken out of the hands of the more conservative medical gatekeepers (by a Conservative government!). All you need to change your legal gender now is to fill in an online form. Hormones or  surgery are not required. Sexual fantasies are no longer stopping you. More and more countries are adopting this position.

Since we have also come to the point where many admit that there is no absolute and clear divide between male and female personality traits, interests, abilities and desires, there is also room for transgender people who do not live up to the clichés of the "true transsexual" or "real men"/"real women". The millennials embrace terms like nonbinary and genderqueer.

I know that the American psychiatric manual still has a chapter of paraphilias that includes "autogynephilia", but the main chapter on gender dysphoria reflects a much more radical and tolerant approach to gender variance.

It is not perfect, far from it, but that chapter does not think crossdreaming invalidates a trans gender identity, and it opens the door to a wide variety of gender identities and gender expressions. Moreover, it no longer considers gender dysphoria a mental illness. The work done in preparation for the new UN ICD manual points in the same direction.

In many ways both activists and scientists in this area is moving towards the position Felix calls "transgender realism" in the book, where we no longer think of MTF transgender people's identity and sexuality as being  carbon copies of the ones of an idealized cis woman.

Their life experience must be understood in context, and that context is that these persons normally have lived their lives being raised as, and presenting as, their assigned gender.

We still need a new sexology for transgender sexuality

So everything is all right, then? We do not need a new sexology? Felix is wrong about this?

No, he is not. In spite of all the progress, we are still fighting old battles. Felix puts it this way:
"Think about it: sexology in its current form is dominated by a binary system -- and I do not mean with respect to gender -- I mean with respect to sexual behavior. There is orientation on the one hand and fetishes (including paraphilias) on the others. This binary is so deeply ingrained that we all follow it, instinctively believing that there is a baseline sexuality...hetero, homo and bi... and then the weird extras that get imprinted and picked up along the way -- fetishes. And to be honest, I think it's a pretty good system... 
...until you start to think about cross gender sexuality... 
... and then it becomes a conceptual prison."
The very existence of transgender people and their sexuality falsifies this model, as I see it. And I believe that is why the system fights so hard to normalize us, to put into boxes that does not mess up the model.

As Felix points out this desire is not an orientation (which seeks people); it is not a fetish (which seeks objects); it is not a paraphilia (which seeks situations). We seek, instead, a state of being, whether this is full identification with our target sex or a need to express sides of being our target sex, This sense of self cannot be reduced to sexuality, but nor can you decouple sexuality from this state of being.

And that is the main problem. Modern, progressive, sexologists may accept and understand that sexual fantasies are natural parts of transgender psychology, but they show -- in general -- little interest in this side of being trans.

The ones that do show an interest are mostly those that still use terms like "autogynephilia" and who believe that any debate on this topic will have to start with the  typology of Ray Blanchard. Even if they despise Blanchard's theory of transgender, they nevertheless help keep that belief system alive, simply by responding to it.

As Felix points out, this is why we need a new approach to the complex phenomenon of sexuality and transgender identities -- why we need a new transgender sexology.

There are other reasons, as well.

Both research and health services have had a strong focus on those transgender people who transition. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. But we also need more research on non-transitioning trans people. They also need help, whether they are gender dysphoric or not.

Autogynephilia gurus like Blanchard and Bailey have obsessively focused on developing classification schemes of perversions. They have done next to nothing in order to develop methods and treatments that can actually help crossdreamers survive and thrive.

And finally: We need sexologists who can look more closely into what Felix calls the quantum mechanics of transgender, i.e. the fact that our gender variance often seems to change according to the way you approach it.

If we look at it as something sexual, it may appear as a fetish. If you dream about crossing genders, on the other hand, gender variance will often appear as a gender identity phenomenon.

I guess this has partly to do with the fact that gender variance varies between people and over time, but also because language and culture will always influence the way you see things. Gender variance can be, in the words of Felix, both "a gender event" and "a sexual event" at the same time.

We need to know more about what causes crossdreamers and transgender people to interpret their experience in this or that way.

If there are any potential sexology Ph.D. students out there who read this. Start researching! We can help you.

See also:
On Quantum Desire and why we need a new sexology of gender variance, where Felix talks about his new book.

The cause of crossdreaming - an alternative model
Magnus Hirschfeld's Crossdreamers
The Two Traditions of Thinking about Transgender
What Dr. Zhana Vrangalova Taught Me About Transphobia in Science
The Autogynephilia Theory is in Violation of Basic Research and Health Care Ethics

Ogas and Gaddam: A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the Internet Tells Us About Sexual Relationships (a study of sexual fantasies which clearly proves that not only transgender people can have kinky dreams.)

Post-election Crossdreamer Blues

$
0
0
After a really bad week I am pulling myself together. I am not going to sit still and watch the transphobes ruin the lives of a new generation of gender variant people. Here's what I shared with my friends over at Crossdream Life today:

I normally avoid discussing politics in trans fora, and plan to continue to do so in the future. Being pro-trans or anti-trans is not really a right wing/left wing conflict.

In Europe you will find right wing governments that change laws in order to help trans people (which recently happened in th UK and Norway). In other word: Both liberals, socialists and conservatives are supporting LGBTQA rights.

However, today I feel that I need to speak out.

The backlash against tolerance and diversity is real and it is clearly associated with the recent nationalist upsurge in countries like Russia, Hungary, Poland, Turkey, Britain and now, the United States. And it seems to be spreading.

I know that quite a few of my crossdreamer friends have had some really, really, bad days since Tuesday, trying hard to cope with the fact that the next US president has allied himself with some of the most homophobic and transphobic people in the world. He might wave the LGBT flag, but when his vice president believes in conversion therapy, we know we are in for a rough patch.

I have already talked about the way this election triggered childhood memories of hazing and bullying in me. The attitude expressed by many Americans right now also remind me of the kind of culture I grew up in: Where any form of femininity or female identification in male assigned people was considered degrading.

The suppression was so intense that I, for one, didn't come to terms with my transgender nature until long after I had become an adult. The fact that so many Americans share this kind of attitudes even now is extremely depressing. I must admit that I been very distraught this week, and this does nothing good for my dysphoria.

We have seen this kind of backlash before. Berlin and Paris before Hitler were open and tolerant cities, with some of the most open LGBT communities in the world. The day the nazis burned the library of Magnus Hirsrchfeld's Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute of Sexual Sience) in 1933 represented the end of that tolerance. Hirschfeld was one of the leading supporters of gay and trans rights at the time.

Lately we have seen immense progress as regards transgender rights, and yes, this also include crossdreamers and crossdressers who are not gender dysphoric or need to transition. Terms like genderqueer and nonbinary has helped the millennials and gen z youth to escape the trap I was forced into: Total self-denial. And it is exactly this kind of tolerance the new wave of aggression is targeting: a society that respects diversity.

I think it is important to keep in mind that this is not 1933. Or, at least, it does not have to be. There are new generations of people out there who will refuse to move back to some mythic time when men were real men and women baked cookies. In fact, I suspect we will soon see a new resistance, one targeting the current wave of sexism, racism, homophobia and transphobia, both in Europe and the US. People are mobilizing as we speak.

Moreover, we should keep in mind that many of those who vote for this new wave of extremist nationalism are not necessarily homophobic or transphobic themselves. They just wanted to show the establishment the finger.

I have decided to climb up of the dark hole I have been sitting in during this election campaign. I will not sit still and watch bigots destroy the lives of new generations of gender variant people.

We already know what to do:

1. We need to continue to listen to other members of our transgender family when they struggle with their sexualities and their identities. If we can help each other out of our basements by listening and talking, we can help each other come to accept and love this strong and life giving side of us.

2. We need to create even stronger alliances between all types of LGBTQA activists. Right now gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and queer people are facing the same bigoted enemy. United we stand so much stronger.

3. We need to call out bigots when we seen and hear them. They only win if we allow them to believe that they now has a free pass to say anything to anyone.

This also applies to those of us who are not out publicly as trans. There is a lot we can do in forums like this one and online in general.

So please, my good crossdreamer and transgender friends: Continue to share your ideas, feelings, fears and love!

Accessing Crossdream Life

$
0
0
Some of you will have noticed that the Crossdream Life forum has been inaccessible parts of today for some of the members. Lefora tells me that we may face some downtime the next few days.

"We have a profile server under maintenance, and your profile is on that sever. The boards are all up and fine, but if you're signed in with a profile that is on that server, you're going to experience some trouble.
The repairs are still running at the moment. 
By the way, not sure if I have told you this, but we are moving to new servers, so it's probably going to be a bit of a bumpy road for the next days. After that, I've been promised that it will be paradise :) We'll be on brand new, very fast servers."

So please be patient. We will soon be back to normal!

How to find love: The challenges facing crossdreamers and transgender people

$
0
0
There is someone for everyone, even if you are gender variant.

I have been communicating with a lot of male to female crossdreamers during the last nine years or so, and one of the major challenges facing many of them is extreme loneliness.

Drawing by Slav
Many of them tell me they have few if any friends. The discussion that follows often leads us in direction of the topic of romance and sex. 

There several reasons for why this becomes problematic:

Firstly, the are often confused about their own gender. As one young British crossdreamer recently told me: "I want to be a girl!"  And if that isn't possible, this person wants at least to dress up like one.

It is hard to go out and seek out a woman for love and companionship, if she expects you to play the role of the straight non-transgender man, and you dream about being the female partner. 

The fact is that many of those who are safely anchored in their assigned gender, also fear condemnation and ridicule if they reveal their gender variance to a partner.

So crossdreamers are facing two problems:

1. To find someone to love

2. If they do find someone to love, they might lose them if they tell them about their transgender nature (and I am using the word transgender in its broad umbrella sense here, including all shades of gender variant).

This is especially a problem for male to female (MTF) crossdreamers who love women.


It is possible to find love

Helen Boyd has written extensively about this dilemma in her books, and as she points out: Some female partners do not accept this side in their partner. She has quite a few harrowing stories about male to female transgender people being thrown out of their houses and denied access to their kids after coming out.

But she also adds the following:
If crossdressers realized what is going on in the rest of the world, they might realize that it's very possible for them to find relationships in which they can commit to a partner and still find themselves sexually satisfied.
Be open about it

She argues that younger women now know about their partner's crossdressing long before marriage, and start in a more accepting place. 

Indeed, much of the anger and disappointment felt by women who find out that their partner is a crossdreamer and/or a crossdresser is not that they are gender variant, but that they have kept this important part of themselves secret. 

The obvious solution is therefore to be upfront about this before the two make a long term commitment. But since most male to female crossdreamers have been conditioned by friends, family and peers to feel ashamed about their feminine inclinations ("real men" don't  dream about being women), they keep their mouths shut out of fear of losing the one they love. That is not an irrational choice. Far from it!

Women who stay

But how tolerant are women when it comes to this kind of gender variance?

Over at Unordinary Style Nadina has done some number crunching based on data from the Crossdressers.com forum. I won't argue that she follows every rule in the rule book of proper social science, but her numbers are interesting all the same.

What she found as regards partners' reactions when they found out their spouse is transgender, was the following:
  • 84% of partners did not leave the relationship upon the reveal
  • 74% percent of the partners are at least somewhat accepting of the gender variance, which could range from DADT [Don't Ask Don't Tell]  to full inclusion and acceptance
  • 68% would be considered to be openly accepting of their partner's gender variance
That is very good news for male to female crossdreamers who want to stay with their partners.

Love is more than sex

From what I see and hear, the key to such acceptance is found in three different scenarios.

The first one is that there probably are as many female to male gender variant people out there as there are male to female (and all genderqueer variants in between).

Although I know that some crossdreamers develop a more exact "queerdar" as they learn about their own gender variance, other crossdreamers are often hard to identify. This also applies to female to male crossdreamers.

MTF crossdreamers and transgender people who are attracted to men may use the gay community to find role models and lovers. This is most often not an option for those who love women.

The second one should be obvious, but is often ignored by crossdreamers who have absorbed the transphobic shame of their culture. There is much, much more to romance and love than gender stereotypes and sexual bravado.

People become friends. Friendship becomes love. And true love is, as I see it, defined by you accepting the other person as he or she is, in full, warts and all. Indeed, people who love each other often come to see the "unexpected" sides as an integrated part of the personality they have come to embrace.

Over at Crossdream Life, male to female crossdreamer Jasmine tells about the pleasant surprise of finding out that their partner did not leave when finding out about Jasmine's transgender nature:
My 'best case scenario' did not include what happened. Not only do I think she would have been 'okay' with me transitioning (though I think with my coping mechanisms I discussed with my therapist I very likely won't need, if only because the benefits won't outweigh the costs), but she's completely on board with me fulling exploring my feminine side through dressing, cosplay, etc.  
Here's the thing that surprised me. I told her about Second Life (which she knew about) and how much I've still been using it (which she didn't), but she's also okay with me having 'sex' with men on Second Life. "It's just the internet," she said. "It's not like you're going out and having sex. THAT I wouldn't be okay with".
My own wife has been extremely supportive, and has done a lot to help me cope with my dysphoria. You can read about her reaction in this blog post.

Sexuality and gender are more fluid than most think
Photo: Andrej K


Thirdly, it turns out sexuality is much more fluid than people are led to believe. Most sexologists admit that such fluidity is a normal part of female sexuality, but I am pretty convinced that this is the case for male sexuality, as well.

Men are just punished so much harder for admitting to "feminine" traits than women are for their "masculine" inclinations.

Some partners of MTF crossdreamers and trans women realize that they are really queer, bisexual or polysexual, and that this broad sexuality/identity leaves more than enough room for loving a trans person.

Amanda Crose, whose partner is now living as a woman, tells such a story over at The Establishment:
I know other women like myself whose spouses’ transitioned genders, and who stayed post-Gender Confirmation Surgery. I can’t speak to their experiences or sexuality, but I can say that I personally stayed because I loved my husband and I knew I could love my wife as well. My spouse, regardless of gender, makes me laugh, is kind to others, is politically active, shares the same political opinions as me, and has the same geeky loves as I do, including, but certainly not limited to, Harry Potter, Star Wars, and Doctor Who. We had a great life together and a beautiful son.
I didn’t want to leave. And so, I stayed.
Physical differences in my wife are becoming more apparent by the day. At first it was the removal of hair, the application of makeup, and the growth of her head hair. Then came the changes of medical transition: the growth of breasts, the development of hips and a waistline, and the softening of her facial features. 
Through these changes, I’ve remained attracted to my spouse. I find her new look to be beautiful in the way I have always been able to find other women beautiful, but the attraction is deeper since we have an emotional connection as well.
And here is the Swedish feminist and scientist Sofia Zettermark talking about her relationship with a male to female transgender person. (The video is from 2011, but as far as I have been able to find out, they are still together).


Having a challenging love life is not a transgender thing

I believe it is also important to keep in mind that love and sex are difficult areas for all people, cis or trans, straight or gay, binary or nonbinary.

In Norway 44 percent of marriages end in divorce, in the US 53. It is a fair guess that the remaining marriages are not trouble free either. And most of these couples do not contain a transgender partner.

And sometimes breaking up is the right thing to do, whether one partner is transgender or not. Life is like that. Sometimes people are unhappier together than apart.

The most important thing to keep in mind is that such a break-up does not mean that you do not deserve love or that love is impossible. This applies whether you stay as your assigned gender or whether you transition.

See also:

The loving wife of a crossdresser
How I found out my husband is a woman inside and what happened next
Cosmo: The sex life of crossdreamers 
Crossdreamer love (MTF hooking up with an FTM)
Sally's list over resources for partners of transgender people
15 Spouses of Transgender People On How Their Relationship Changed After The Unexpected Transition

And since I know that so many MTF crossdreamers think everything is impossible, I also include Jessica Darling's video (No, I have no idea why she chose that soundtrack...).


Here is another one by Sissy Bouget:

 

And here is a partner's reaction to a female to male reveal.

Yes, I'm Barbara

$
0
0
I asked Barbara over at Crossdream Life for permission to republish a version of a blog post she wrote for her own Crossdream Life blog (which is restricted to CDL members). It is a poetic presentation of a psychological breakthrough as regards gender and gender identity. This is not uncommon among transgender people, although the way this takes place may vary a lot. Barbara is a male to female crossdreamer.
Sometimes transgender doubts may be resolved by
a psychological breakthrough. (Illustration: sezer66)


Guest post by Barbara

It started with innocent restless obsession with all the things gender :) Old beliefs about two-spirited people were shaken, new ideas were written on the water, I was consuming page after page of  information in the vain hope of reaching the unreachable.

All this was be accompanied by one single black metal band: Mgła. Their great albums were the only music that I could stand. Excellent melodies, dark atmosphere and nihilistic lyrics; this combination was exactly right. A good dose of nihilism was a good thing; 

If I were to come to some conclusion, it had better not be an artificial construct, not a made-up position. So aggressively questioning everything except feelings was a right thing to do. Day after day tension built, thoughts buzzed in my head like a swarm of locusts.

The main question was: Who am I? Am I two-spirited? Am I female? Or is it all is made up and I just have a fetish (I’m a fetish, how funny)?

Is that true, that female part of me, or is it a defensive construct? What if the male part of me is an artificial construct? (Giggles) It feels like a right thought. What am I wearing? Male clothes? But why? Am I a female to male crossdresser? (more giggles) Ok, I’m not bad at passing as male (Did I say that aloud?) 

Honey, how are you sitting? It is not very feminine! (another giggle) Locusts in my head began to shadow the sun, they were everywhere; their buzzing was always with me.

At the same time I had a strong sense that nothing can go wrong, that there can’t be a negative outcome. No matter what conclusion would be made, it would be the right conclusion. 

I have told some of my thoughts to friends in the Crossdream Life chat room. They have encouraged me to write about this in the forum, and the chat logs served me as a draft to post about my feelings. I can’t thank them enough; in some sense they are my godmothers.
Black Metal band Mgła. Photo:Joanna Osoba 


Shortly after hitting “Post” button all doubts returned for a few seconds, but there was one single thought, that stopped them: it is too late to doubt.

And then IT hit me.

All thoughts stopped, locusts vanished, tension gone. It was like a lightning without a sound or a flash, just a sudden release of all tension from the atmosphere. There was a rain, pure feminine feelings dropping onto me, washing away remnants of old shell.

There was a sunshine after rain, drying a single tear of joy, shining through me, radiant and splendid, so warm, caressing me from the inside.

This lightning have divided my memories in two different parts, before | after. What was before, has become more distant, under a gray veil, except for some high crossdreamig moments. They are still brightly colored.

Thinking of myself as a “male”, “guy”, “masculine” hurts almost physically. I become hardwired into myself :) Every thought about trueself fills me with joyful sunshine of femmeness.

Something else, something wonderful happened. Feeling the phantom body is wonderful. This is a miracle, this is not supposed to happen. It comes and goes without pattern, but I can always bring the right body back. Even if it’s only an illusion, just a feeling.

I still wish to have the right physical body -- that call is there -- but there is no sadness. Not  any longer. There are the precious sensations of the phantom body and a light smile.

Here I am, united with my trueself, showering in lovely feminine feelings. This is enough and not enough for me at the same time, and both sides of that dilemma is good. Smile and sunshine is the most important part.

No, trans women are not men and trans men are not women

$
0
0
You meet them online, you meet them in various social settings: The people who think that gender is so simple that it is only a matter of what’s between your legs. Here is my response to one such individual.
Photo: Visivasnc
 “Transwomen are male, Transmen are female, there is nothing wrong with that fact at all.”
I hear this argument over and over again: "Men are men, and women are women. It is simple!"
No, this is not simple.
In this context I normally hear one of three explanations for what male and female are:
1. It is about genitalia -- taken as a sign of biological sex.
(The reality is much more complex, by the way. Many are born with ambiguous genitalia)
2.. It is about chromosomes -- XX is female, XY is male.
(This is not true either, there are intersex XX males and XY females who live as -- and identify with -- their assigned gender).
3. It is all about upbringing and socialization 
(Nope: The fundamental gender identity rarely changes even if you are raised as the opposite sex.)
Transgender feelings are real, regardless of what is causing them
In spite of genitalia, chromosomes and upbringing. In spite of a culture that harasses and ridicules gender variance (and in particular femininity and female identities in those assigned male). In spite of societies that reward men richly for playing the manly game: There they are, trans people who dream, long and desperately need to live their lives as the gender they feel they are. 
They did not ask for this mismatch. Most of them would give a lot not to feel this way. But they do and it does not go away.  For many of them this is a matter of life and death. The attempted suicide rate among transgender people is 40 percent. You do not try to kill yourself unless you are experiencing something very, very real.
In other words: The very existence of transgender men and women, the very people you try to invalidate, proves that you are wrong.
Genderqueer and nonbinary people prove that gender is a complex issue
And, on top of that, there are quite a few transgender and genderqueer people who find it hard to identify with only one of the two genders. They may feel that they are somewhere in between, or that their identity is both male and female or masculine and feminine at the same time. 
This is another indication of gender not being as clear-cut and binary as you might think.
Biological sex and experienced gender are often two separate things
If you are trying to say that biological sex is real, by all means say so. You could simply say that "trans women were born with biological male characteristics" or something to that effect. But the very existence of gender dysphoric trans people tells us that biological sex is not the same as experienced gender.
(I know that there are trans activists who are not willing to use the term biological sex at all, arguing that the biological male body of a non-transitioning male to female transgender person is a female body, since her gender identity is female. This is equally pedantic. While you make biological sex the only real factor, they insist that experienced gender is. We need some kind of language to talk about gender incongruence, and in order to do that, we need to talk about both biological sex and gender, even if the terms are ambiguous and complicated.)
A word does not equal a “thing” out there
The idea that words can be reduced to a sign referring to something “out there” in the “real world”, has been abandoned by most linguists and philosophers. 
I am not a post-modernist, and I do believe that natural science has a lot to say about sex, sexuality and gender, but the words “man” and “woman”, as we use them in everyday language, cannot be reduced to biology. 
Felix Conrad gives an excellent example of the flexibility of language his book Am I a Woman?where he refers to the fact that a “mother” who does not give physically birth to a child may nevertheless be recognized as its mother. She might have adopted her child.  (The linguist George Lakoff makes a similar point in his excellent book, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, a book I highly recommend to those who think word’s can be reduced to physics and biology, detached from the metaphors we make use of.)
Even if there is a biological reality (and there is!), the way we classify what we see is in most ways cultural. This also applies to terms like "mental illness", "paraphilia" and "fetish", which are often used to invalidate trans people. These are words made by people who feel threatened by gender variance and who want to  push transgender people back into the closet.
There is more than enough room in words like “man” and “woman” to include trans men and trans women, if we want to.
And why shouldn't we?
Viewing all 257 articles
Browse latest View live